linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rachel Sibley <rasibley@redhat.com>
To: CKI Project <cki-project@redhat.com>,
	will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Jianlin Shi <jishi@redhat.com>, Jianwen Ji <jiji@redhat.com>,
	Hangbin Liu <haliu@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.5.0-rc6-40f39e8.cki (arm-next)
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 08:55:33 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <84a09727-2e6e-04d1-e647-341f7f04110e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cki.1A6A8CC1CF.1989HWSEIM@redhat.com>



On 1/16/20 8:19 AM, CKI Project wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
> 
>         Kernel repo: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
>              Commit: 40f39e8372fe - Merge branch 'for-next/core' into for-kernelci
> 
> The results of these automated tests are provided below.
> 
>      Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
>               Merge: OK
>             Compile: OK
>               Tests: FAILED
> 
> All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
> 
>    https://artifacts.cki-project.org/pipelines/385274
> 
> One or more kernel tests failed:
> 
>      aarch64:
>       ❌ Networking tunnel: gre basic
>       ❌ Networking tunnel: vxlan basic


Please disregard the networking failures, they are caused by an infrastructure bug
related to our test harness being too chatty when extracting the test repo, this leads
to test timeouts and aborts. We have a workaround in place which was merged this morning
and you should hopefully stop seeing these failures soon. Sorry about the false positives,
and hope the explanation makes sense.

-Rachel

> 
> We hope that these logs can help you find the problem quickly. For the full
> detail on our testing procedures, please scroll to the bottom of this message.
> 
> Please reply to this email if you have any questions about the tests that we
> ran or if you have any suggestions on how to make future tests more effective.
> 
>          ,-.   ,-.
>         ( C ) ( K )  Continuous
>          `-',-.`-'   Kernel
>            ( I )     Integration
>             `-'
> ______________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Compile testing
> ---------------
> 
> We compiled the kernel for 1 architecture:
> 
>      aarch64:
>        make options: -j30 INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1 targz-pkg
> 
> 
> Hardware testing
> ----------------
> We booted each kernel and ran the following tests:
> 
>    aarch64:
>      Host 1:
>         ✅ Boot test
>         ✅ Podman system integration test (as root)
>         ✅ Podman system integration test (as user)
>         ✅ LTP
>         ✅ Loopdev Sanity
>         ✅ Memory function: memfd_create
>         ✅ AMTU (Abstract Machine Test Utility)
>         ✅ Networking bridge: sanity
>         ✅ Ethernet drivers sanity
>         ✅ Networking MACsec: sanity
>         ✅ Networking socket: fuzz
>         ✅ Networking sctp-auth: sockopts test
>         ✅ Networking: igmp conformance test
>         ✅ Networking route: pmtu
>         ✅ Networking route_func: local
>         ✅ Networking route_func: forward
>         ✅ Networking TCP: keepalive test
>         ✅ Networking UDP: socket
>         ✅ Networking tunnel: geneve basic test
>         ❌ Networking tunnel: gre basic
>         ✅ L2TP basic test
>         ❌ Networking tunnel: vxlan basic
>         ✅ Networking ipsec: basic netns transport
>         ✅ Networking ipsec: basic netns tunnel
>         ✅ audit: audit testsuite test
>         ✅ httpd: mod_ssl smoke sanity
>         ✅ tuned: tune-processes-through-perf
>         ✅ ALSA PCM loopback test
>         ✅ ALSA Control (mixer) Userspace Element test
>         ✅ storage: SCSI VPD
>         ✅ trace: ftrace/tracer
>         🚧 ✅ CIFS Connectathon
>         🚧 ✅ POSIX pjd-fstest suites
>         ⏱  jvm test suite
>         ⏱  Memory function: kaslr
>         ⏱  LTP: openposix test suite
>         ⏱  Networking vnic: ipvlan/basic
>         ⏱  iotop: sanity
>         ⏱  Usex - version 1.9-29
>         ⏱  storage: dm/common
> 
>      Host 2:
> 
>         ⚡ Internal infrastructure issues prevented one or more tests (marked
>         with ⚡⚡⚡) from running on this architecture.
>         This is not the fault of the kernel that was tested.
> 
>         ✅ Boot test
>         ✅ xfstests: ext4
>         ✅ xfstests: xfs
>         ✅ selinux-policy: serge-testsuite
>         ✅ lvm thinp sanity
>         ✅ storage: software RAID testing
>         ✅ stress: stress-ng
>         🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ IPMI driver test
>         🚧 ✅ IPMItool loop stress test
>         🚧 ✅ Storage blktests
> 
>    Test sources: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker
>      💚 Pull requests are welcome for new tests or improvements to existing tests!
> 
> Waived tests
> ------------
> If the test run included waived tests, they are marked with 🚧. Such tests are
> executed but their results are not taken into account. Tests are waived when
> their results are not reliable enough, e.g. when they're just introduced or are
> being fixed.
> 
> Testing timeout
> ---------------
> We aim to provide a report within reasonable timeframe. Tests that haven't
> finished running are marked with ⏱. Reports for non-upstream kernels have
> a Beaker recipe linked to next to each host.
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-16 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-16 13:19 ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.5.0-rc6-40f39e8.cki (arm-next) CKI Project
2020-01-16 13:55 ` Rachel Sibley [this message]
     [not found] ` <CAKv+Gu-CEGOdTvektx_pqD=WqUXFi3YKXmj=pka5CiHc-6dCSQ@mail.gmail.com>
2020-01-16 14:14   ` Veronika Kabatova
2020-01-16 14:33     ` Will Deacon
     [not found]       ` <CAKv+Gu_BqEz_Q1H9CXe1ZTCkExEnAtsrdEQcPXZthsgGhWxK9A@mail.gmail.com>
2020-01-16 16:26         ` Veronika Kabatova
     [not found]     ` <CAKv+Gu_Q5tpf1UakSHuDKq7_3BgMavpwucK6cz_k=VcDD0y8dw@mail.gmail.com>
2020-01-16 15:31       ` Jakub Racek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=84a09727-2e6e-04d1-e647-341f7f04110e@redhat.com \
    --to=rasibley@redhat.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cki-project@redhat.com \
    --cc=haliu@redhat.com \
    --cc=jiji@redhat.com \
    --cc=jishi@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).