From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: matthias.bgg@gmail.com (Matthias Brugger) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 22:00:55 +0300 Subject: [PATCH v2 RESEND 1/2] dt-bindings: serial: 8250: Add MediaTek BTIF controller bindings In-Reply-To: <29b52a3b95982f1097766d515aae09c57e11b002.1503165144.git.sean.wang@mediatek.com> References: <29b52a3b95982f1097766d515aae09c57e11b002.1503165144.git.sean.wang@mediatek.com> Message-ID: <8548a72a-4bf3-d44a-6d26-d64721cffe85@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 08/19/2017 09:06 PM, sean.wang at mediatek.com wrote: > From: Sean Wang > > Document the devicetree bindings in 8250.txt for MediaTek BTIF > controller which could be found on MT7622 and MT7623 SoC. > > Signed-off-by: Sean Wang > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/8250.txt | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/8250.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/8250.txt > index 419ff6c..7528d90 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/8250.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/8250.txt > @@ -14,6 +14,9 @@ Required properties: > tegra132, or tegra210. > - "nxp,lpc3220-uart" > - "ralink,rt2880-uart" > + - For MediaTek MT7623, must contain "mediatek,mt7623-btif" > + - For other MediaTek SoCs , must contain "mediatek,-btif", > + "mediatek,mt7623-btif" where is mt7622. Hm, to me that's confusing. What about: "mediatek,mt7623-btif": for MediaTek MT7623 "mediatek,mt7622-btif", "mediatek,mt7623-btif": for MediaTek MT7622 If in the future we have more SoCs that support the BTIF, we should add them like the mt7622 case. Make sense? Regards, Matthias