From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: arm64: selftests: Fixes for single-step test
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 13:52:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8635ahpu1y.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221117002350.2178351-1-seanjc@google.com>
On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 00:23:48 +0000,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
>
> Marc,
>
> I would like to route this through Paolo's tree/queue for 6.2 along with
> a big pile of other selftests updates. I am hoping to get the selftests
> pile queued sooner than later as there is a lot of active development in
> that area, and don't want to have the selftests be in a broken state.
> I'm going to send Paolo a pull request shortly, I'll Cc you (and others)
> to keep everyone in the loop and give a chance for objections.
>
>
>
> Fix a typo and an imminenent not-technically-a-bug bug in the single-step
> test where executing an atomic sequence in the guest with single-step
> enable will hang the guest due to eret clearing the local exclusive
> monitor.
>
>
> Sean Christopherson (2):
> KVM: arm64: selftests: Disable single-step with correct KVM define
> KVM: arm64: selftests: Disable single-step without relying on ucall()
I'm obviously late to the party, but hey... For the record:
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-17 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-17 0:23 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: arm64: selftests: Fixes for single-step test Sean Christopherson
2022-11-17 0:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: selftests: Disable single-step with correct KVM define Sean Christopherson
2022-11-17 0:43 ` Oliver Upton
2022-11-17 3:07 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-11-17 0:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: arm64: selftests: Disable single-step without relying on ucall() Sean Christopherson
2022-11-17 0:53 ` Oliver Upton
2022-11-17 1:20 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-17 15:19 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-17 22:32 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-17 7:07 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-11-17 13:52 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8635ahpu1y.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=reijiw@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).