From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: chris@printf.net (Chris Ball) Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 18:27:06 +0000 Subject: [PATCH RFC 07/31] mmc: sdhci: push card_tasklet into threaded irq handler In-Reply-To: <20140221103710.GB21483@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (Russell King's message of "Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:37:10 +0000") References: <20140218175703.GJ21483@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20140219094322.GR21483@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20140219095212.GT21483@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20140219105011.GU21483@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20140220105903.GY21483@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20140221103710.GB21483@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <8638jbvw91.fsf@void.printf.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On Fri, Feb 21 2014, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 04:48:58PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> Nothing wrong in that, only right.. Do you want me to float a patch for >> this or you can get that done along with your series? > > I'll send a follow-up mini-series of five patches for it. It shouldn't > depend all that much on the bigger series - and I think the first two > patches could well do with going into -rc. Thanks. Since testing resources might be scarce, and it looks like Viresh is in favor of the series, any objections to putting these in mmc-next straight away rather than waiting for test results to come in? - Chris. -- Chris Ball