From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] KVM: arm64: Move hyp state to hyp_vmemmap
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2025 11:08:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <865xk9nsh5.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z9Q3-FM-QwiIn9gh@google.com>
On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 14:06:48 +0000,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Friday 14 Mar 2025 at 11:31:36 (+0000), Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 00:33:08 +0000,
> > Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com> wrote:
> > > @@ -698,13 +697,13 @@ int __pkvm_host_share_hyp(u64 pfn)
> > > if (ret)
> > > goto unlock;
> > > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NVHE_EL2_DEBUG)) {
> > > - ret = __hyp_check_page_state_range((u64)virt, size, PKVM_NOPAGE);
> > > + ret = __hyp_check_page_state_range(phys, size, PKVM_NOPAGE);
> >
> > OK, I think I finally clicked here. Does it mean that all the tracking
> > is now done in terms of PAs instead of VAs?
>
> Yep, that's exactly that. The hyp_vmemmap is indexed by pfn, so I felt
> that the conversion to a PA-based tracking made sense. That also make it
> clear that the 'hyp state' is not a property of a mapping, but really of
> the underlying physical page.
It indeed makes sense. It is just that it took me some time to realise
the extent of the change.
>
> > > if (ret)
> > > goto unlock;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - prot = pkvm_mkstate(PAGE_HYP, PKVM_PAGE_SHARED_BORROWED);
> > > - WARN_ON(pkvm_create_mappings_locked(virt, virt + size, prot));
> > > + __hyp_set_page_state_range(phys, size, PKVM_PAGE_SHARED_BORROWED);
> > > + WARN_ON(pkvm_create_mappings_locked(virt, virt + size, PAGE_HYP));
> >
> > And this is the split between the state now being kept in the on a PA
> > base and the actual mapping that is now only takes the page attributes
> > and no SW bits?
>
> Precisely, and the next patch in this series takes advantage of the
> fact that we're now de-correlating the hyp state from the presence of a
> hyp s1 mapping in the linear map range. In the future there'll be more
> use-cases for this I think (e.g. the hyp allocator where we'll have
> pages owned by the hypervisor but only mapped in the 'private' range,
> things like that).
Yup, that's probably the correct direction of travel. The hypervisor
shouldn't need to map everything -- quite the opposite actually.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-16 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-27 0:33 [PATCH 0/6] Move pKVM ownership state to hyp_vmemmap Quentin Perret
2025-02-27 0:33 ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: arm64: Track SVE state in the hypervisor vcpu structure Quentin Perret
2025-02-27 0:33 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: arm64: Use 0b11 for encoding PKVM_NOPAGE Quentin Perret
2025-03-14 11:07 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-03-14 14:13 ` Quentin Perret
2025-03-16 11:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-02-27 0:33 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: arm64: Introduce {get,set}_host_state() helpers Quentin Perret
2025-02-27 0:33 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: arm64: Move hyp state to hyp_vmemmap Quentin Perret
2025-03-03 9:47 ` Vincent Donnefort
2025-03-13 19:13 ` Quentin Perret
2025-03-14 11:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-03-14 14:06 ` Quentin Perret
2025-03-16 11:08 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2025-02-27 0:33 ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: arm64: Defer EL2 stage-1 mapping on share Quentin Perret
2025-02-27 0:33 ` [PATCH 6/6] KVM: arm64: Unconditionally cross check hyp state Quentin Perret
2025-03-16 11:12 ` [PATCH 0/6] Move pKVM ownership state to hyp_vmemmap Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=865xk9nsh5.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).