linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] KVM: arm64: Move hyp state to hyp_vmemmap
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2025 11:08:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <865xk9nsh5.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z9Q3-FM-QwiIn9gh@google.com>

On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 14:06:48 +0000,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com> wrote:
> 
> On Friday 14 Mar 2025 at 11:31:36 (+0000), Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 00:33:08 +0000,
> > Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com> wrote:
> > > @@ -698,13 +697,13 @@ int __pkvm_host_share_hyp(u64 pfn)
> > >  	if (ret)
> > >  		goto unlock;
> > >  	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NVHE_EL2_DEBUG)) {
> > > -		ret = __hyp_check_page_state_range((u64)virt, size, PKVM_NOPAGE);
> > > +		ret = __hyp_check_page_state_range(phys, size, PKVM_NOPAGE);
> > 
> > OK, I think I finally clicked here. Does it mean that all the tracking
> > is now done in terms of PAs instead of VAs?
> 
> Yep, that's exactly that. The hyp_vmemmap is indexed by pfn, so I felt
> that the conversion to a PA-based tracking made sense. That also make it
> clear that the 'hyp state' is not a property of a mapping, but really of
> the underlying physical page.

It indeed makes sense. It is just that it took me some time to realise
the extent of the change.

> 
> > >  		if (ret)
> > >  			goto unlock;
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > -	prot = pkvm_mkstate(PAGE_HYP, PKVM_PAGE_SHARED_BORROWED);
> > > -	WARN_ON(pkvm_create_mappings_locked(virt, virt + size, prot));
> > > +	__hyp_set_page_state_range(phys, size, PKVM_PAGE_SHARED_BORROWED);
> > > +	WARN_ON(pkvm_create_mappings_locked(virt, virt + size, PAGE_HYP));
> > 
> > And this is the split between the state now being kept in the on a PA
> > base and the actual mapping that is now only takes the page attributes
> > and no SW bits?
> 
> Precisely, and the next patch in this series takes advantage of the
> fact that we're now de-correlating the hyp state from the presence of a
> hyp s1 mapping in the linear map range. In the future there'll be more
> use-cases for this I think (e.g. the hyp allocator where we'll have
> pages owned by the hypervisor but only mapped in the 'private' range,
> things like that).

Yup, that's probably the correct direction of travel. The hypervisor
shouldn't need to map everything -- quite the opposite actually.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-16 11:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-27  0:33 [PATCH 0/6] Move pKVM ownership state to hyp_vmemmap Quentin Perret
2025-02-27  0:33 ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: arm64: Track SVE state in the hypervisor vcpu structure Quentin Perret
2025-02-27  0:33 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: arm64: Use 0b11 for encoding PKVM_NOPAGE Quentin Perret
2025-03-14 11:07   ` Marc Zyngier
2025-03-14 14:13     ` Quentin Perret
2025-03-16 11:03       ` Marc Zyngier
2025-02-27  0:33 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: arm64: Introduce {get,set}_host_state() helpers Quentin Perret
2025-02-27  0:33 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: arm64: Move hyp state to hyp_vmemmap Quentin Perret
2025-03-03  9:47   ` Vincent Donnefort
2025-03-13 19:13     ` Quentin Perret
2025-03-14 11:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2025-03-14 14:06     ` Quentin Perret
2025-03-16 11:08       ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2025-02-27  0:33 ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: arm64: Defer EL2 stage-1 mapping on share Quentin Perret
2025-02-27  0:33 ` [PATCH 6/6] KVM: arm64: Unconditionally cross check hyp state Quentin Perret
2025-03-16 11:12 ` [PATCH 0/6] Move pKVM ownership state to hyp_vmemmap Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=865xk9nsh5.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).