From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stuebner) Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:28:23 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v1 2/7] dt-bindings: iio: rockchip-saradc: add support for rk3328 In-Reply-To: <1489572237-6649-3-git-send-email-cl@rock-chips.com> References: <1489572237-6649-1-git-send-email-cl@rock-chips.com> <1489572237-6649-3-git-send-email-cl@rock-chips.com> Message-ID: <8664375.8vdE6CQfX9@phil> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Am Mittwoch, 15. M?rz 2017, 18:03:52 CET schrieb cl at rock-chips.com: > From: Chen Liang > > The rk3328 saradc is the same as rk3399. > > Signed-off-by: Chen Liang > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rockchip-saradc.txt | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rockchip-saradc.txt > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rockchip-saradc.txt index > 205593f..f81bc20 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rockchip-saradc.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rockchip-saradc.txt > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ Required properties: > - "rockchip,saradc": for rk3188, rk3288 > - "rockchip,rk3066-tsadc": for rk3036 > - "rockchip,rk3399-saradc": for rk3399 > + - "rockchip,rk3328-saradc", "rockchip,rk3399-saradc": for rk3328 not sure how iio people see that, but I would suggest keeping the order, so put rk3328 above rk3399. Heiko