From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25FF3C27C53 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 12:12:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Message-ID:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=MPaDAP5hdWOtXJ1fjdV8s+TFim1Wj39CVt6+56ZhYn4=; b=XXMz0L/B05GvD2JMqn29y1p0K2 XM5XozmpIDcHArgaaNurItWsnIh7Wu0AI6L1T/sREEDopFKXV/sqMRduiG8AU4wi0lkPZssdzo1dt zJ/N76D+Ygp1mbFBVcVNkEp1re9LHFyQXYgLoFMVWiMg08gcyIb1rRxRKgP2uPfLOG4qz9cj2GmlL H6H/Mt9hmstfe0m+mh9a4Q7JOXRgtLzOyPu0SfbHCIVY4khuDyrHMk6H5FOtEFtDoc80Y4k6oiQpe e1463zbENeOf3QQBr5/DikoqC07RZ0xh7nueJiOg8UUpa4jSk+z8FDI+Wzj2YGTSnvbtqC99s58LD xnHZTfBA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sJuAN-0000000177E-2dyP; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 12:11:55 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sJuAJ-00000001750-2gW3 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 12:11:53 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE64F61DC8; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 12:11:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 778F7C4AF1D; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 12:11:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1718799110; bh=8UC3dd/xs1eHvnpkbzMHjvpFYyuJFdFAOtxj21nX+eg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=sc38HwOXXA8zwNu1EdxnZfwAfuSgOQAgHP98hrVE8/M1bYDhPzGiO2utokmcGPh1O tUL7KmeG5lBnM5WSk8yS/X47u3Dd3UmY2teYTP7QE3Vb8AptBUIXiCRPVRJ7AjS6Zr LNs4+n7wK0e8Id0QAB6MiwNXdtY0v7B/ymqcOPu6+hrsUidSmxxRKPEpwQB/vcNMr8 Yb9jHJs98KH+8M5/8tRuph9lP666N3CpqYfCuiejh8sdyMsx5eQyh5hnnuVRaQHMOd JpcDIKnRshkSsCf6s4mO7+BYH6mXPLaKKeY3HVgG37cdfWuK0Yz4VLu2NXh2TS5d9F MKgqmi0zKCfdg== Received: from sofa.misterjones.org ([185.219.108.64] helo=goblin-girl.misterjones.org) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1sJuAG-005RXt-4M; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 13:11:48 +0100 Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 13:11:47 +0100 Message-ID: <867celjfng.wl-maz@kernel.org> From: Marc Zyngier To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: Will Deacon , "Catalin\ Marinas" , , , , , , , Mark Rutland , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , "Miguel Luis" , James Morse , "Salil Mehta" , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Hanjun Guo , Gavin Shan , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , , , Karl Heubaum Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/19] ACPI/arm64: add support for virtual cpu hotplug In-Reply-To: <20240613112511.00006331@huawei.com> References: <20240529133446.28446-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> <20240613112511.00006331@huawei.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/29.2 (aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 185.219.108.64 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com, will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linuxarm@huawei.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, x86@kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, rafael@kernel.org, miguel.luis@oracle.com, james.morse@arm.com, salil.mehta@huawei.com, jean-philippe@linaro.org, guohanjun@huawei.com, gshan@redhat.com, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, justin.he@arm.com, jianyong.wu@arm.com, karl.heubaum@oracle.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240619_051151_775607_468E9092 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 27.30 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:25:27 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Wed, 29 May 2024 14:34:27 +0100 > Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > v10: > > - Make acpi_processor_set_per_cpu() return 0 / error rather than bool > > to simplify error handling at the call sites. > > (Thanks to both Rafael and Gavin who commented on this) > > - Gather tags. > > - Rebase on v6.10-rc1 > > > > The approach to the GICv3 changes stablized very late in the 6.10 cycle. > > Subject to Marc taking a final look at those, I think we are now > > in a good state wrt to those and the ACPI parts. The remaining code > > that hasn't received review tags from the relevant maintainers > > is the arm64 specific arch_register_cpu(). Given I think this will go > > through the arm64 tree, hopefully they have just been waiting for > > everything else to be ready. > > Marc, Will, Catalin, > > Any comments on this series? We definitely want to finally land this > in 6.11! > > Marc, in practice I think you already gave feedback on the the GICv3 > changes in here as part of the discussions in the earlier version threads, > but if you have time for a final glance through it would be much appreciated. > Thanks for all your earlier help on this btw. I've had a quick look and the GICv3 parts look OK to me (you should now have by tags for both patches). Thanks, M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.