From: D Scott Phillips <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI: bus: Consolidate all arm specific initialisation into acpi_arm_init()
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2023 17:11:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <867cnzqojo.fsf@scott-ph-mail.amperecomputing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230606093531.2746732-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> writes:
> Move all of the ARM-specific initialization into one function namely
> acpi_arm_init(), so it is not necessary to modify/update bus.c every
> time a new piece of it is added.
>
> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
> Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAJZ5v0iBZRZmV_oU+VurqxnVMbFN_ttqrL=cLh0sUH+=u0PYsw@mail.gmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/arm64/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/acpi/arm64/agdi.c | 2 +-
> drivers/acpi/arm64/apmt.c | 2 +-
> drivers/acpi/arm64/init.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> drivers/acpi/arm64/init.h | 6 ++++++
> drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 1 +
> drivers/acpi/bus.c | 7 +------
> include/linux/acpi.h | 6 ++++++
> include/linux/acpi_agdi.h | 13 -------------
> include/linux/acpi_apmt.h | 19 -------------------
> include/linux/acpi_iort.h | 2 --
> 11 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/arm64/init.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/arm64/init.h
> delete mode 100644 include/linux/acpi_agdi.h
> delete mode 100644 include/linux/acpi_apmt.h
>
> v1[1]->v2:
> - Used IS_ENABLED and made the init functions' declarations
> unconditional
> - Added review tags
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230605103550.2427459-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/arm64/Makefile
> index e21a9e84e394..f81fe24894b2 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/Makefile
> @@ -3,4 +3,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_AGDI) += agdi.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_IORT) += iort.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_GTDT) += gtdt.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_APMT) += apmt.o
> -obj-y += dma.o
> +obj-y += dma.o init.o
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/agdi.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/agdi.c
> index f605302395c3..8b3c7d42b41b 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/agdi.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/agdi.c
> @@ -9,11 +9,11 @@
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) "ACPI: AGDI: " fmt
>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> -#include <linux/acpi_agdi.h>
> #include <linux/arm_sdei.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include "init.h"
>
> struct agdi_data {
> int sdei_event;
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/apmt.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/apmt.c
> index 8cab69fa5d59..e5c3bc99fc79 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/apmt.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/apmt.c
> @@ -10,10 +10,10 @@
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) "ACPI: APMT: " fmt
>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> -#include <linux/acpi_apmt.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include "init.h"
>
> #define DEV_NAME "arm-cs-arch-pmu"
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/init.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/init.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d3ce53dda122
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/init.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include "init.h"
> +
> +void __init acpi_arm_init(void)
> +{
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_AGDI))
> + acpi_agdi_init();
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_APMT))
> + acpi_apmt_init();
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_IORT))
> + acpi_iort_init();
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/init.h b/drivers/acpi/arm64/init.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..a1715a2a34e9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/init.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +
> +void __init acpi_agdi_init(void);
> +void __init acpi_apmt_init(void);
> +void __init acpi_iort_init(void);
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> index 38fb84974f35..3631230a61c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/dma-map-ops.h>
> +#include "init.h"
>
> #define IORT_TYPE_MASK(type) (1 << (type))
> #define IORT_MSI_TYPE (1 << ACPI_IORT_NODE_ITS_GROUP)
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> index d161ff707de4..7a1eaf8c7bde 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> @@ -26,9 +26,6 @@
> #include <asm/mpspec.h>
> #include <linux/dmi.h>
> #endif
> -#include <linux/acpi_agdi.h>
> -#include <linux/acpi_apmt.h>
> -#include <linux/acpi_iort.h>
> #include <linux/acpi_viot.h>
> #include <linux/pci.h>
> #include <acpi/apei.h>
> @@ -1408,7 +1405,7 @@ static int __init acpi_init(void)
> acpi_init_ffh();
>
> pci_mmcfg_late_init();
> - acpi_iort_init();
> + acpi_arm_init();
> acpi_viot_early_init();
> acpi_hest_init();
> acpi_ghes_init();
> @@ -1420,8 +1417,6 @@ static int __init acpi_init(void)
> acpi_debugger_init();
> acpi_setup_sb_notify_handler();
> acpi_viot_init();
> - acpi_agdi_init();
> - acpi_apmt_init();
Hi Sudeep, this moves acpi_agdi_init() before acpi_ghes_init().
sdei initialization currently happens from ghes_init, so agdi devices
using SDEI can no longer probe:
| [ 0.515864] sdei: Failed to create event 1073741825: -5
| [ 0.515866] agdi agdi.0: Failed to register for SDEI event 1073741825
| [ 0.515867] agdi: probe of agdi.0 failed with error -5
| ...
| [ 0.516022] sdei: SDEIv1.0 (0x0) detected in firmware.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-07 0:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-06 9:35 [PATCH v2] ACPI: bus: Consolidate all arm specific initialisation into acpi_arm_init() Sudeep Holla
2023-06-06 9:50 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-06-06 12:02 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-06-06 14:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-06-07 14:11 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-06-08 7:07 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-06-08 18:17 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-07 0:11 ` D Scott Phillips [this message]
2023-10-09 12:29 ` Hanjun Guo
2023-10-09 13:05 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-10 7:16 ` Hanjun Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=867cnzqojo.fsf@scott-ph-mail.amperecomputing.com \
--to=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).