From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
scott@os.amperecomputing.com, keyur@os.amperecomputing.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: arm64: nv: Emulate ISTATUS when emulated timers are fired.
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2023 11:46:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <867cy5b1mq.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y1qqe2pg.wl-maz@kernel.org>
On Thu, 29 Dec 2022 13:53:15 +0000,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 07:03:03 +0100,
> Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com> wrote:
> >
> > Guest-Hypervisor forwards the timer interrupt to Guest-Guest, if it is
> > enabled, unmasked and ISTATUS bit of register CNTV_CTL_EL0 is set for a
> > loaded timer.
> >
> > For NV2 implementation, the Host-Hypervisor is not emulating the ISTATUS
> > bit while forwarding the Emulated Vtimer Interrupt to Guest-Hypervisor.
> > This results in the drop of interrupt from Guest-Hypervisor, where as
> > Host Hypervisor marked it as an active interrupt and expecting Guest-Guest
> > to consume and acknowledge. Due to this, some of the Guest-Guest vCPUs
> > are stuck in Idle thread and rcu soft lockups are seen.
> >
> > This issue is not seen with NV1 case since the register CNTV_CTL_EL0 read
> > trap handler is emulating the ISTATUS bit.
> >
> > Adding code to set/emulate the ISTATUS when the emulated timers are fired.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c
> > index 27a6ec46803a..0b32d943d2d5 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c
> > @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ static u64 kvm_arm_timer_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > struct arch_timer_context *timer,
> > enum kvm_arch_timer_regs treg);
> > static bool kvm_arch_timer_get_input_level(int vintid);
> > +static u64 read_timer_ctl(struct arch_timer_context *timer);
> >
> > static struct irq_ops arch_timer_irq_ops = {
> > .get_input_level = kvm_arch_timer_get_input_level,
> > @@ -356,6 +357,8 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart kvm_hrtimer_expire(struct hrtimer *hrt)
> > return HRTIMER_RESTART;
> > }
> >
> > + /* Timer emulated, emulate ISTATUS also */
> > + timer_set_ctl(ctx, read_timer_ctl(ctx));
>
> Why should we do that for non-NV2 configurations?
>
> > kvm_timer_update_irq(vcpu, true, ctx);
> > return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
> > }
> > @@ -458,6 +461,8 @@ static void timer_emulate(struct arch_timer_context *ctx)
> > trace_kvm_timer_emulate(ctx, should_fire);
> >
> > if (should_fire != ctx->irq.level) {
> > + /* Timer emulated, emulate ISTATUS also */
> > + timer_set_ctl(ctx, read_timer_ctl(ctx));
> > kvm_timer_update_irq(ctx->vcpu, should_fire, ctx);
> > return;
> > }
>
> I'm not overly keen on this. Yes, we can set the status bit there. But
> conversely, the bit will not get cleared when the guest reprograms the
> timer, and will take a full exit/entry cycle for it to appear.
>
> Ergo, the architecture is buggy as memory (the VNCR page) cannot be
> used to emulate something as dynamic as a timer.
>
> It is only with FEAT_ECV that we can solve this correctly by trapping
> the counter/timer accesses and emulate them for the guest hypervisor.
> I'd rather we add support for that, as I expect all the FEAT_NV2
> implementations to have it (and hopefully FEAT_FGT as well).
So I went ahead and implemented some very basic FEAT_ECV support to
correctly emulate the timers (trapping the CTL/CVAL accesses).
Performance dropped like a rock (~30% extra overhead) for L2
exit-heavy workloads that are terminated in userspace, such as virtio.
For those workloads, vcpu_{load,put}() in L1 now generate extra traps,
as we save/restore the timer context, and this is enough to make
things visibly slower, even on a pretty fast machine.
I managed to get *some* performance back by satisfying CTL/CVAL reads
very early on the exit path (a pretty common theme with NV). Which
means we end-up needing something like what you have -- only a bit
more complete. I came up with the following:
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c
index 4945c5b96f05..a198a6211e2a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c
@@ -450,6 +450,25 @@ static void kvm_timer_update_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool new_level,
{
int ret;
+ /*
+ * Paper over NV2 brokenness by publishing the interrupt status
+ * bit. This still results in a poor quality of emulation (guest
+ * writes will have no effect until the next exit).
+ *
+ * But hey, it's fast, right?
+ */
+ if (vcpu_has_nv2(vcpu) && is_hyp_ctxt(vcpu) &&
+ (timer_ctx == vcpu_vtimer(vcpu) || timer_ctx == vcpu_ptimer(vcpu))) {
+ u32 ctl = timer_get_ctl(timer_ctx);
+
+ if (new_level)
+ ctl |= ARCH_TIMER_CTRL_IT_STAT;
+ else
+ ctl &= ~ARCH_TIMER_CTRL_IT_STAT;
+
+ timer_set_ctl(timer_ctx, ctl);
+ }
+
timer_ctx->irq.level = new_level;
trace_kvm_timer_update_irq(vcpu->vcpu_id, timer_ctx->irq.irq,
timer_ctx->irq.level);
which reports the interrupt state in all cases.
Does this work for you?
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-02 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-24 6:03 [PATCH 0/3] KVM: arm64: nv: Fixes for Nested Virtualization issues Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2022-08-24 6:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: arm64: nv: only emulate timers that have not yet fired Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2022-12-29 13:00 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-09 12:25 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2023-01-09 13:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-09 14:03 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2022-08-24 6:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: arm64: nv: Emulate ISTATUS when emulated timers are fired Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2022-12-29 13:53 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-02 11:46 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2023-01-03 4:21 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2023-01-10 8:41 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2023-01-10 10:46 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-24 6:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: arm64: nv: Avoid block mapping if max_map_size is smaller than block size Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2022-12-29 17:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-03 4:26 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2023-01-09 13:58 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2022-10-10 5:56 ` [PATCH 0/3] KVM: arm64: nv: Fixes for Nested Virtualization issues Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2022-10-19 7:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-10 12:17 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2023-01-10 14:05 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-10 21:54 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-11 7:54 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-11 8:46 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2023-01-11 8:48 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2023-01-11 11:39 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-11 12:46 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2023-01-11 13:36 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=867cy5b1mq.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=keyur@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).