From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
oliver.upton@linux.dev, will@kernel.org, joey.gouly@arm.com,
suzuki.poulose@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, vladimir.murzin@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/9] KVM: arm64: Fix Trace Buffer trap polarity for protected VMs
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 10:23:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <868qftqehe.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251118103807.707500-3-tabba@google.com>
On Tue, 18 Nov 2025 10:37:59 +0000,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> wrote:
>
> The E2TB bits in MDCR_EL2 control trapping of Trace Buffer system
> register accesses. These accesses are trapped to EL2 when the bits are
> clear.
>
> The trap initialization logic for protected VMs in pvm_init_traps_mdcr()
> had the polarity inverted. When a guest did not support the Trace Buffer
> feature, the code was setting E2TB. This incorrectly disabled the trap,
> potentially allowing a protected guest to access registers for a feature
> it was not given.
>
> Fix this by inverting the operation.
>
> Fixes: f50758260bff ("KVM: arm64: Group setting traps for protected VMs by control register")
> Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
> index 8d06a246dfd1..f6f8996c4f97 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
> @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static void pvm_init_traps_mdcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> val |= MDCR_EL2_TTRF;
>
> if (!kvm_has_feat(kvm, ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, TraceBuffer, IMP))
> - val |= MDCR_EL2_E2TB_MASK;
> + val &= ~MDCR_EL2_E2TB_MASK;
This does not only change the trapping logic (bit 24). It also change
the ownership of the buffer (bit 25). I wonder whether you should do
something for that, maybe by clearing TRBLIMITR_EL1.E, because
otherwise, you keep tracing, but using an EL2 VA. What could possibly
go wrong?
Overall, I'm very uneasy about TRBE in the context of pKVM.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-26 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-18 10:37 [PATCH v5 0/9] KVM: arm64: Fixes for guest CPU feature trapping and enabling Fuad Tabba
2025-11-18 10:37 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] KVM: arm64: Fix Trace Buffer trapping for protected VMs Fuad Tabba
2025-11-18 10:37 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] KVM: arm64: Fix Trace Buffer trap polarity " Fuad Tabba
2025-11-18 11:11 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-11-26 10:23 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2025-11-26 10:29 ` James Clark
2025-11-26 10:36 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-11-26 10:39 ` James Clark
2025-11-26 10:37 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-11-26 11:47 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-11-26 11:48 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-11-27 15:26 ` James Clark
2025-11-27 15:38 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-11-27 16:06 ` James Clark
2025-11-27 16:23 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-11-18 10:38 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] KVM: arm64: Fix MTE flag initialization " Fuad Tabba
2025-11-18 10:38 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] KVM: arm64: Introduce helper to calculate fault IPA offset Fuad Tabba
2025-11-18 10:38 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] KVM: arm64: Include VM type when checking VM capabilities in pKVM Fuad Tabba
2025-11-26 10:52 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-11-26 11:00 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-11-26 15:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-11-26 17:05 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-11-18 10:38 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] KVM: arm64: Do not allow KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE for any guest " Fuad Tabba
2025-11-18 10:38 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] KVM: arm64: Track KVM IOCTLs and their associated KVM caps Fuad Tabba
2025-11-18 10:38 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] KVM: arm64: Check whether a VM IOCTL is allowed in pKVM Fuad Tabba
2025-11-18 10:38 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] KVM: arm64: Prevent host from managing timer offsets for protected VMs Fuad Tabba
2025-11-18 10:39 ` [PATCH v5 0/9] KVM: arm64: Fixes for guest CPU feature trapping and enabling Fuad Tabba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=868qftqehe.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).