From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA08ED1F9D1 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2025 12:02:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Message-ID:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=7pScc9OMlOahLVz734DzEX17niS1eZXgML4q9K2qgCQ=; b=EmynJDk/Nb0z8xRqKv8W2TYtZk 4OprxJzISMAnAjpO+6+lJ9v8J/nNXDuISiTO1moLiEexilwaFS2p3xsrIk4gK9X1eGBWVD3YkThdp i1ySL7ilAIE5gScJfPuTBXM1Vmrzf5s7jxo9UoqvIPZe/1N7YJgHMWNmQsNCyms4jFyPFZueECYyr IfGPU4Nw7Kx4NlbXqqDemnKQTOHccXMAuA/CpzcMJmr8usM5d688TZmS9WWkCevMyLXEqBjUYDmN7 twHm4u9pT+zIsjanAiX/9wGIEiRWp5Qu4SNHC3U+ZIWWSgUZLL5sEeqjBrN9++1fAS3gxpUm2YXj2 d4WH7S2g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vR82s-00000007xJr-2qIc; Thu, 04 Dec 2025 12:02:50 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c04:e001:324:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vR82r-00000007xJW-3IXz for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2025 12:02:49 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5034601E6; Thu, 4 Dec 2025 12:02:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93C1DC4CEFB; Thu, 4 Dec 2025 12:02:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1764849768; bh=qAFev/ZMR+BvH9bpLAKRlFmk+BNmyUPl+SRKdAw5gt0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=u4oXrp0oVv3YCP/h84RVudsXPgHYL9O+cuZOsBm6sWa2kINAWtlbOj7Dhd//xmaxJ n/6ZiWpgpFuNfYS4e/SUD8ar9kBTjFl39et6B24yBU5Lf7W2E2RD5xQspYizIeLUQG Oh7aDlymvfpO25RAxAbLOjdPVUF1zW/cDn4a4xjDhYfY/ZNMkL1QEZQTtuQ4+8Ix// RU3810sBs92AONbLrwu1mKyWT541HNLyEZQRjfqwneoHzaG/gIJrOAzNk0LClIGRLy LD7ZcSDZsf8pxbrI8IeLCvS8qDrVtQZ+SYuVr28vCR2FdB8iVRiRTO1LrwZIN4iYjt KrlJd+OS8ErZg== Received: from sofa.misterjones.org ([185.219.108.64] helo=goblin-girl.misterjones.org) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vR82o-0000000ARD4-1xKl; Thu, 04 Dec 2025 12:02:46 +0000 Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2025 12:02:46 +0000 Message-ID: <86bjkepi8p.wl-maz@kernel.org> From: Marc Zyngier To: Ben Horgan Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Joey Gouly , Suzuki K Poulose , Oliver Upton , Zenghui Yu , Yao Yuan Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] arm64: Repaint ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1.IDS description In-Reply-To: References: <20251204094806.3846619-1-maz@kernel.org> <20251204094806.3846619-2-maz@kernel.org> <86cy4uplo5.wl-maz@kernel.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/30.1 (aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 185.219.108.64 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ben.horgan@arm.com, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, joey.gouly@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, oupton@kernel.org, yuzenghui@huawei.com, yaoyuan@linux.alibaba.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, 04 Dec 2025 11:13:41 +0000, Ben Horgan wrote: > > Hi Marc, > > On 12/4/25 10:48, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > On Thu, 04 Dec 2025 10:36:54 +0000, > > Ben Horgan wrote: > >> > >> Hi Marc, > >> > >> On 12/4/25 09:47, Marc Zyngier wrote: > >>> ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1.IDS, as described in the sysreg file, is pretty horrible > >>> as it diesctly give the ESR value. Repaint it using the usual NI/IMP > >>> identifiers to describe the absence/presence of FEAT_IDST. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier > >>> --- > >>> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/sys_regs.c | 2 +- > >>> arch/arm64/tools/sysreg | 4 ++-- > >>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/sys_regs.c > >>> index 82da9b03692d4..107d62921b168 100644 > >>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/sys_regs.c > >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/sys_regs.c > >>> @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static const struct pvm_ftr_bits pvmid_aa64mmfr2[] = { > >>> MAX_FEAT(ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1, UAO, IMP), > >>> MAX_FEAT(ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1, IESB, IMP), > >>> MAX_FEAT(ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1, AT, IMP), > >>> - MAX_FEAT_ENUM(ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1, IDS, 0x18), > >>> + MAX_FEAT_ENUM(ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1, IDS, IMP), > >>> MAX_FEAT(ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1, TTL, IMP), > >>> MAX_FEAT(ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1, BBM, 2), > >>> MAX_FEAT(ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1, E0PD, IMP), > >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg > >>> index 1c6cdf9d54bba..3261e8791ac03 100644 > >>> --- a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg > >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg > >>> @@ -2257,8 +2257,8 @@ UnsignedEnum 43:40 FWB > >>> 0b0001 IMP > >>> EndEnum > >>> Enum 39:36 IDS > >> > >> Should this also be changed to an UnsignedEnum? > > > > I'm not sure this brings much when you only have two values. If IDS > > was growing a third value, and that there was an actual order in the > > numbering scheme, then yes, that'd be useful. > > Joey just pointed out to me that there is a new third field. Not in the > arm reference manual yet, but mentioned in the xml. I'm unsure if it's > necessary to consider this at the moment though. > > https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0601/2025-09/AArch64-Registers/ID-AA64MMFR2-EL1--AArch64-Memory-Model-Feature-Register-2?lang=en Ah, nice catch. In which case I agree that this should become UnsignedEnum, as the new EL3 feature is a strict superset of 0b0001. I'll add fix for that on top. Thanks, M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.