From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
Cc: oliver.upton@linux.dev, james.morse@arm.com,
suzuki.poulose@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Consider NUMA affinity when allocating per-CPU stack_page
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 08:36:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86bk6brsb5.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240415033614.43518-1-lirongqing@baidu.com>
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 04:36:14 +0100,
Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com> wrote:
>
> per-CPU stack_page are dominantly accessed from their own local CPUs,
> so allocate them node-local to improve performance.
Do you have any performance data to back this up?
Given that this is only used in the non-VHE case, and that by doing so
you have left quite a lot of performance on the floor already, I'm
even more surprised to see the performance argument.
Furthermore, you don't address the allocation of per-CPU data, which
has a much larger potential impact, given how the HYP code is
structured.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index c4a0a35..d745d01 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -2330,15 +2330,15 @@ static int __init init_hyp_mode(void)
> * Allocate stack pages for Hypervisor-mode
> */
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> - unsigned long stack_page;
> + struct page *page;
>
> - stack_page = __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!stack_page) {
> + page = alloc_pages_node(cpu_to_node(cpu), GFP_KERNEL, 0);
> + if (!page) {
> err = -ENOMEM;
> goto out_err;
> }
>
> - per_cpu(kvm_arm_hyp_stack_page, cpu) = stack_page;
> + per_cpu(kvm_arm_hyp_stack_page, cpu) = page_address(page);
> }
>
> /*
The patch itself looks correct, however partial and lacking some
convincing data.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-15 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-15 3:36 [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Consider NUMA affinity when allocating per-CPU stack_page Li RongQing
2024-04-15 7:36 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2024-04-18 6:53 ` Li,Rongqing
2024-04-18 9:03 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86bk6brsb5.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lirongqing@baidu.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).