From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier) Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 08:51:24 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp: add missing spin_lock init In-Reply-To: <20171025072326.21030-1-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> (Antoine Tenart's message of "Wed, 25 Oct 2017 09:23:26 +0200") References: <20171025072326.21030-1-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <86efprfywz.fsf@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Oct 25 2017 at 9:23:26 am BST, Antoine Tenart wrote: > A spin lock is used in the irq-mvebu-gicp driver, but it is never > initialized. This patch adds the missing spin_lock_init() call in the > driver's probe function. > > Fixes: a68a63cb4dfc ("irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp: Add new driver for Marvell GICP") > Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart > --- > drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.c > index b283fc90be1e..17a4a7b6cdbb 100644 > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.c > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-gicp.c > @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ static int mvebu_gicp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return -ENOMEM; > > gicp->dev = &pdev->dev; > + spin_lock_init(&gicp->spi_lock); > > gicp->res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > if (!gicp->res) Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org Acked-by: Marc Zyngier Thomas, can you please queue this ASAP? Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.