public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
	joey.gouly@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, qperret@google.com,
	vdonnefort@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/13] KVM: arm64: Refactor user_mem_abort() into a state-object model
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2026 15:34:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86ikb96kg8.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260306140232.2193802-1-tabba@google.com>

Hi Fuad,

On Fri, 06 Mar 2026 14:02:19 +0000,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> wrote:
> 
> As promised in my recent patch series fixing a couple of urgent bugs in
> user_mem_abort() [1], here is the actual refactoring to finally clean up this
> monolith.
> 
> If you look through the Fixes: history of user_mem_abort(), you will start to
> see a very clear pattern of whack-a-mole caused by the sheer size and
> complexity of the function. For example:
> - We keep leaking struct page references on early error returns because the
>   cleanup logic is hard to track (e.g., 5f9466b50c1b and the atomic fault leak
>   I just fixed in the previous series).
> - We have had uninitialized memcache pointers (157dbc4a321f) because the
>   initialization flow jumps around unpredictably.
> - We have had subtle TOCTOU and locking boundary bugs (like 13ec9308a857 and
>   f587661f21eb) because we drop the mmap_read_lock midway through the function
>   but leave the vma pointer and mmu_seq floating around in the same lexical
>   scope, tempting people to use them.
> 
> The bulk of the work is in the first 6 patches, which perform a strict,
> no-logic-change structural refactoring of user_mem_abort() into a clean,
> sequential dispatcher.
> 
> We introduce a state object, struct kvm_s2_fault, which encapsulates
> both the input parameters and the intermediate state. Then,
> user_mem_abort() is broken down into focused, standalone helpers:
> - kvm_s2_resolve_vma_size(): Determines the VMA shift and page size.
> - kvm_s2_fault_pin_pfn(): Handles faulting in the physical page.
>   - kvm_s2_fault_get_vma_info(): A tightly-scoped sub-helper that isolates the
>     mmap_read_lock, VMA lookup, and metadata snapshotting.
> - kvm_s2_fault_compute_prot(): Computes stage-2 protections and evaluates
>   permission/execution constraints.
> - kvm_s2_fault_map(): Manages the KVM MMU lock, mmu_seq retry loops, MTE, and
>   the final stage-2 mapping.
> 
> This structural change makes the "danger zone" foolproof. By isolating
> the mmap_read_lock region inside a tightly-scoped sub-helper
> (kvm_s2_fault_get_vma_info), the vma pointer is confined. It snapshots
> the required metadata into the kvm_s2_fault structure before dropping
> the lock. Because the pointers scope ends when the sub-helper returns,
> accessing a stale VMA in the mapping phase is not possible by design.
> 
> The remaining patches in are localized cleanup patches. With the logic
> finally extracted into digestible helpers, these patches take the
> opportunity to streamline struct initialization, drop redundant struct
> variables, simplify nested math, and hoist validation checks (like MTE)
> out of the lock-heavy mapping phase.
> 
> I think that there are still more opportunities to tidy things up some
> more, but I'll stop here to see what you think.

Thanks a lot for going through this, this looks like a very valuable
starting point. From a high-level perspective, the end result is even
more shocking:

<quote>
static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
			  struct kvm_s2_trans *nested,
			  struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot, unsigned long hva,
			  bool fault_is_perm)
{
	bool write_fault = kvm_is_write_fault(vcpu);
	bool logging_active = memslot_is_logging(memslot);
	struct kvm_s2_fault fault = {
		.vcpu = vcpu,
		.fault_ipa = fault_ipa,
		.nested = nested,
		.memslot = memslot,
		.hva = hva,
		.fault_is_perm = fault_is_perm,
		.ipa = fault_ipa,
		.logging_active = logging_active,
		.force_pte = logging_active,
		.prot = KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_R,
		.fault_granule = fault_is_perm ? kvm_vcpu_trap_get_perm_fault_granule(vcpu) : 0,
		.write_fault = write_fault,
		.exec_fault = kvm_vcpu_trap_is_exec_fault(vcpu),
		.topup_memcache = !fault_is_perm || (logging_active && write_fault),
	};
</quote>

This kvm_s2_fault structure is a mess of architectural state (the
fault itself), hypervisor context (logging_active, force_pte...), and
implementation details (topup_memcache...). Effectively, that's the
container for *everything* that was a variable in u_m_a() is now part
of the structure that is passed around.

The task at hand is now to completely nuke this monster. The
architectural fault information should be further split, and directly
passed as a parameter to user_mem_abort(). We have a lot of redundant
state that is computed, recomputed, derived, and that should probably
moved into the exact place where it matters.

I'll have a play with it,

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-06 15:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-06 14:02 [PATCH v1 00/13] KVM: arm64: Refactor user_mem_abort() into a state-object model Fuad Tabba
2026-03-06 14:02 ` [PATCH v1 01/13] KVM: arm64: Extract VMA size resolution in user_mem_abort() Fuad Tabba
2026-03-17 15:07   ` Joey Gouly
2026-03-06 14:02 ` [PATCH v1 02/13] KVM: arm64: Introduce struct kvm_s2_fault to user_mem_abort() Fuad Tabba
2026-03-17 16:00   ` Joey Gouly
2026-03-06 14:02 ` [PATCH v1 03/13] KVM: arm64: Extract PFN resolution in user_mem_abort() Fuad Tabba
2026-03-06 14:02 ` [PATCH v1 04/13] KVM: arm64: Isolate mmap_read_lock inside new kvm_s2_fault_get_vma_info() helper Fuad Tabba
2026-03-06 14:02 ` [PATCH v1 05/13] KVM: arm64: Extract stage-2 permission logic in user_mem_abort() Fuad Tabba
2026-03-06 14:02 ` [PATCH v1 06/13] KVM: arm64: Extract page table mapping " Fuad Tabba
2026-03-06 14:02 ` [PATCH v1 07/13] KVM: arm64: Simplify nested VMA shift calculation Fuad Tabba
2026-03-06 14:02 ` [PATCH v1 08/13] KVM: arm64: Remove redundant state variables from struct kvm_s2_fault Fuad Tabba
2026-03-06 14:02 ` [PATCH v1 09/13] KVM: arm64: Simplify return logic in user_mem_abort() Fuad Tabba
2026-03-06 14:02 ` [PATCH v1 10/13] KVM: arm64: Initialize struct kvm_s2_fault completely at declaration Fuad Tabba
2026-03-06 14:02 ` [PATCH v1 11/13] KVM: arm64: Optimize early exit checks in kvm_s2_fault_pin_pfn() Fuad Tabba
2026-03-17 17:10   ` Joey Gouly
2026-03-06 14:02 ` [PATCH v1 12/13] KVM: arm64: Hoist MTE validation check out of MMU lock path Fuad Tabba
2026-03-06 14:02 ` [PATCH v1 13/13] KVM: arm64: Clean up control flow in kvm_s2_fault_map() Fuad Tabba
2026-03-06 15:34 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2026-03-06 15:44   ` [PATCH v1 00/13] KVM: arm64: Refactor user_mem_abort() into a state-object model Fuad Tabba
2026-03-16 18:13     ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86ikb96kg8.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox