linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Sascha Bischoff <Sascha.Bischoff@arm.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"kvmarm@lists.linux.dev" <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
	"oliver.upton@linux.dev" <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Joey Gouly <Joey.Gouly@arm.com>,
	Suzuki Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>,
	"yuzenghui@huawei.com" <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	"peter.maydell@linaro.org" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"lpieralisi@kernel.org" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	Timothy Hayes <Timothy.Hayes@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/32] KVM: arm64: gic-v3: Switch vGIC-v3 to use generated ICH_VMCR_EL2
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 11:52:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86ldj4nesf.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251212152215.675767-3-sascha.bischoff@arm.com>

On Fri, 12 Dec 2025 15:22:35 +0000,
Sascha Bischoff <Sascha.Bischoff@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> From: Sascha Bischoff <Sascha.Bischoff@arm.com>
> 
> The VGIC-v3 code relied on hand-written definitions for the
> ICH_VMCR_EL2 register. This register, and the associated fields, is
> now generated as part of the sysreg framework. Move to using the
> generated definitions instead of the hand-written ones.
> 
> There are no functional changes as part of this change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h      | 21 ---------
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c      | 64 ++++++++++++----------------
>  arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3-nested.c |  8 ++--
>  arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c        | 48 ++++++++++-----------
>  4 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> index 9df51accbb025..b3b8b8cd7bf1e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> @@ -560,7 +560,6 @@
>  #define SYS_ICC_SRE_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 12, 9, 5)
>  #define SYS_ICH_EISR_EL2		sys_reg(3, 4, 12, 11, 3)
>  #define SYS_ICH_ELRSR_EL2		sys_reg(3, 4, 12, 11, 5)
> -#define SYS_ICH_VMCR_EL2		sys_reg(3, 4, 12, 11, 7)
>  
>  #define __SYS__LR0_EL2(x)		sys_reg(3, 4, 12, 12, x)
>  #define SYS_ICH_LR0_EL2			__SYS__LR0_EL2(0)
> @@ -988,26 +987,6 @@
>  #define ICH_LR_PRIORITY_SHIFT	48
>  #define ICH_LR_PRIORITY_MASK	(0xffULL << ICH_LR_PRIORITY_SHIFT)
>  
> -/* ICH_VMCR_EL2 bit definitions */
> -#define ICH_VMCR_ACK_CTL_SHIFT	2
> -#define ICH_VMCR_ACK_CTL_MASK	(1 << ICH_VMCR_ACK_CTL_SHIFT)
> -#define ICH_VMCR_FIQ_EN_SHIFT	3
> -#define ICH_VMCR_FIQ_EN_MASK	(1 << ICH_VMCR_FIQ_EN_SHIFT)
> -#define ICH_VMCR_CBPR_SHIFT	4
> -#define ICH_VMCR_CBPR_MASK	(1 << ICH_VMCR_CBPR_SHIFT)
> -#define ICH_VMCR_EOIM_SHIFT	9
> -#define ICH_VMCR_EOIM_MASK	(1 << ICH_VMCR_EOIM_SHIFT)
> -#define ICH_VMCR_BPR1_SHIFT	18
> -#define ICH_VMCR_BPR1_MASK	(7 << ICH_VMCR_BPR1_SHIFT)
> -#define ICH_VMCR_BPR0_SHIFT	21
> -#define ICH_VMCR_BPR0_MASK	(7 << ICH_VMCR_BPR0_SHIFT)
> -#define ICH_VMCR_PMR_SHIFT	24
> -#define ICH_VMCR_PMR_MASK	(0xffUL << ICH_VMCR_PMR_SHIFT)
> -#define ICH_VMCR_ENG0_SHIFT	0
> -#define ICH_VMCR_ENG0_MASK	(1 << ICH_VMCR_ENG0_SHIFT)
> -#define ICH_VMCR_ENG1_SHIFT	1
> -#define ICH_VMCR_ENG1_MASK	(1 << ICH_VMCR_ENG1_SHIFT)
> -
>  /*
>   * Permission Indirection Extension (PIE) permission encodings.
>   * Encodings with the _O suffix, have overlays applied (Permission Overlay Extension).
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
> index 0b670a033fd87..24a2074f3a8cf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
> @@ -569,11 +569,11 @@ static int __vgic_v3_highest_priority_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 vmcr,
>  			continue;
>  
>  		/* Group-0 interrupt, but Group-0 disabled? */
> -		if (!(val & ICH_LR_GROUP) && !(vmcr & ICH_VMCR_ENG0_MASK))
> +		if (!(val & ICH_LR_GROUP) && !(vmcr & ICH_VMCR_EL2_VENG0_MASK))
>  			continue;
>  
>  		/* Group-1 interrupt, but Group-1 disabled? */
> -		if ((val & ICH_LR_GROUP) && !(vmcr & ICH_VMCR_ENG1_MASK))
> +		if ((val & ICH_LR_GROUP) && !(vmcr & ICH_VMCR_EL2_VENG1_MASK))
>  			continue;
>  
>  		/* Not the highest priority? */
> @@ -646,19 +646,19 @@ static int __vgic_v3_get_highest_active_priority(void)
>  
>  static unsigned int __vgic_v3_get_bpr0(u32 vmcr)
>  {
> -	return (vmcr & ICH_VMCR_BPR0_MASK) >> ICH_VMCR_BPR0_SHIFT;
> +	return FIELD_GET(ICH_VMCR_EL2_VBPR0, vmcr);
>  }
>  
>  static unsigned int __vgic_v3_get_bpr1(u32 vmcr)
>  {
>  	unsigned int bpr;
>  
> -	if (vmcr & ICH_VMCR_CBPR_MASK) {
> +	if (vmcr & ICH_VMCR_EL2_VCBPR_MASK) {
>  		bpr = __vgic_v3_get_bpr0(vmcr);
>  		if (bpr < 7)
>  			bpr++;
>  	} else {
> -		bpr = (vmcr & ICH_VMCR_BPR1_MASK) >> ICH_VMCR_BPR1_SHIFT;
> +		bpr = FIELD_GET(ICH_VMCR_EL2_VBPR1, vmcr);
>  	}
>  
>  	return bpr;
> @@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ static void __vgic_v3_read_iar(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 vmcr, int rt)
>  	if (grp != !!(lr_val & ICH_LR_GROUP))
>  		goto spurious;
>  
> -	pmr = (vmcr & ICH_VMCR_PMR_MASK) >> ICH_VMCR_PMR_SHIFT;
> +	pmr = FIELD_GET(ICH_VMCR_EL2_VPMR, vmcr);
>  	lr_prio = (lr_val & ICH_LR_PRIORITY_MASK) >> ICH_LR_PRIORITY_SHIFT;
>  	if (pmr <= lr_prio)
>  		goto spurious;
> @@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ static int ___vgic_v3_write_dir(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 vmcr, int rt)
>  	int lr;
>  
>  	/* EOImode == 0, nothing to be done here */
> -	if (!(vmcr & ICH_VMCR_EOIM_MASK))
> +	if (!FIELD_GET(ICH_VMCR_EL2_VEOIM_MASK, vmcr))

nit: FIELD_GET() doesn't bring anything here. Similar comment applies
to most 'if (val & MASK)' constructs that get changed here.

>  		return 1;
>  
>  	/* No deactivate to be performed on an LPI */
> @@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ static void __vgic_v3_write_eoir(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 vmcr, int rt)
>  	}
>  
>  	/* EOImode == 1 and not an LPI, nothing to be done here */
> -	if ((vmcr & ICH_VMCR_EOIM_MASK) && !(vid >= VGIC_MIN_LPI))
> +	if (FIELD_GET(ICH_VMCR_EL2_VEOIM_MASK, vmcr) && !(vid >= VGIC_MIN_LPI))
>  		return;
>  
>  	lr_prio = (lr_val & ICH_LR_PRIORITY_MASK) >> ICH_LR_PRIORITY_SHIFT;
> @@ -865,12 +865,12 @@ static void __vgic_v3_write_eoir(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 vmcr, int rt)
>  
>  static void __vgic_v3_read_igrpen0(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 vmcr, int rt)
>  {
> -	vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, rt, !!(vmcr & ICH_VMCR_ENG0_MASK));
> +	vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, rt, !!FIELD_GET(ICH_VMCR_EL2_VENG0_MASK, vmcr));

Here, !! is actually really superfluous and makes it harder to
understand what is being done. Similar thing for IRGPEN1.

Apart from these two points, this looks OK to me.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.


  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-15 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-12 15:22 [PATCH 00/32] KVM: arm64: Introduce vGIC-v5 with PPI support Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-12 15:22 ` [PATCH 01/32] KVM: arm64: Account for RES1 bits in DECLARE_FEAT_MAP() and co Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-12 15:22 ` [PATCH 02/32] KVM: arm64: gic-v3: Switch vGIC-v3 to use generated ICH_VMCR_EL2 Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-15 11:52   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2025-12-15 14:15     ` Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-12 15:22 ` [PATCH 04/32] arm64/sysreg: Add remaining GICv5 ICC_ & ICH_ sysregs for KVM support Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-12 15:22 ` [PATCH 03/32] arm64/sysreg: Drop ICH_HFGRTR_EL2.ICC_HAPR_EL1 and make RES1 Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-12 15:22 ` [PATCH 05/32] arm64/sysreg: Add GICR CDNMIA encoding Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-12 15:22 ` [PATCH 08/32] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Sanitize ID_AA64PFR2_EL1.GCIE Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-12 15:22 ` [PATCH 06/32] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Add ARM_VGIC_V5 device to KVM headers Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-12 15:22 ` [PATCH 07/32] KVM: arm64: gic: Introduce interrupt type helpers Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-15 13:32   ` Marc Zyngier
2025-12-15 16:01     ` Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-15 16:05     ` Marc Zyngier
2025-12-16  8:57       ` Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-12 15:22 ` [PATCH 09/32] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Compute GICv5 FGTs on vcpu load Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-12 16:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2025-12-15 17:37     ` Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-12 15:22 ` [PATCH 10/32] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Add emulation for ICC_IAFFID_EL1 accesses Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-15 17:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2025-12-16 10:57     ` Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-12 15:22 ` [PATCH 12/32] KVM: arm64: gic: Set vgic_model before initing private IRQs Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-12 15:22 ` [PATCH 13/32] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Add vgic-v5 save/restore hyp interface Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-17 11:07   ` Marc Zyngier
2025-12-17 21:42     ` Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-12 15:22 ` [PATCH 11/32] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Trap and emulate ICH_PPI_HMRx_EL1 accesses Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-16 10:41   ` Marc Zyngier
2025-12-16 11:54     ` Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-16 15:09       ` Marc Zyngier
2025-12-12 15:22 ` [PATCH 14/32] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Implement GICv5 load/put and save/restore Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-13  5:59   ` kernel test robot
2025-12-15 10:54     ` Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-13  8:05   ` kernel test robot
2025-12-22 16:52   ` kernel test robot
2025-12-12 15:22 ` [PATCH 15/32] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Implement direct injection of PPIs Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-17 11:40   ` Marc Zyngier
2025-12-12 15:22 ` [PATCH 16/32] KVM: arm64: gic: Introduce irq_queue and set_pending_state to irq_ops Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-17  9:34   ` Marc Zyngier
2025-12-17 20:50     ` Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-12 15:22 ` [PATCH 18/32] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Check for pending PPIs Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-17 11:49   ` Joey Gouly
2025-12-17 12:00     ` Joey Gouly
2025-12-18  8:17       ` Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-17 14:29   ` Marc Zyngier
2025-12-12 15:22 ` [PATCH 17/32] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Implement PPI interrupt injection Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-17 10:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2025-12-17 21:10     ` Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-17 15:54   ` Joey Gouly
2025-12-12 15:22 ` [PATCH 19/32] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Init Private IRQs (PPIs) for GICv5 Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-17 17:13   ` Marc Zyngier
2025-12-12 15:22 ` [PATCH 20/32] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Support GICv5 interrupts with KVM_IRQ_LINE Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-12 15:22 ` [PATCH 22/32] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Reset vcpu state Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-12 15:22 ` [PATCH 21/32] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Create, init vgic_v5 Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-12 15:22 ` [PATCH 23/32] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Bump arch timer for GICv5 Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-15 15:50   ` Marc Zyngier
2025-12-16 10:55     ` Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-12 15:22 ` [PATCH 24/32] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Mandate architected PPI for PMU emulation on GICv5 Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-12 15:22 ` [PATCH 25/32] KVM: arm64: gic: Hide GICv5 for protected guests Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-12 15:22 ` [PATCH 26/32] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Hide FEAT_GCIE from NV GICv5 guests Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-12 15:22 ` [PATCH 27/32] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Introduce kvm_arm_vgic_v5_ops and register them Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-12 15:22 ` [PATCH 28/32] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Set ICH_VCTLR_EL2.En on boot Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-12 15:22 ` [PATCH 30/32] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Probe for GICv5 device Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-12 15:22 ` [PATCH 29/32] irqchip/gic-v5: Check if impl is virt capable Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-16 15:40   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2025-12-17 20:46     ` Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-12 15:22 ` [PATCH 31/32] Documentation: KVM: Introduce documentation for VGICv5 Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-15  0:15   ` kernel test robot
2025-12-15  9:56   ` Peter Maydell
2025-12-15 13:01     ` Sascha Bischoff
2025-12-12 15:22 ` [PATCH 32/32] KVM: arm64: selftests: Introduce a minimal GICv5 PPI selftest Sascha Bischoff

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86ldj4nesf.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=Joey.Gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=Sascha.Bischoff@arm.com \
    --cc=Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=Timothy.Hayes@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).