linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marc Bonnici <marc.bonnici@arm.com>,
	Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>,
	Coboy Chen <coboy.chen@mediatek.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	Olivier Deprez <olivier.deprez@arm.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 14/17] KVM: arm64: FFA: Remove access of endpoint memory access descriptor array
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2023 11:08:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86leciog2w.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230929-ffa_v1-1_notif-v3-14-c8e4f15190c8@arm.com>

On Fri, 29 Sep 2023 16:03:03 +0100,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> FF-A v1.1 removes the fixed location of endpoint memory access descriptor
> array within the memory transaction descriptor structure. In preparation
> to remove the ep_mem_access member from the ffa_mem_region structure,
> provide the accessor to fetch the offset and use the same in FF-A proxy
> implementation.
> 
> The accessor take the boolean argument that indicates if the memory access
> descriptor versions is v1(old format) or not. Currently it is set true as
> FF-A proxy supports only v1.0
> 
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c | 8 ++++++--
>  include/linux/arm_ffa.h       | 6 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c
> index 6e4dba9eadef..5f956f53e6bf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c
> @@ -423,6 +423,7 @@ static __always_inline void do_ffa_mem_xfer(const u64 func_id,
>  	DECLARE_REG(u32, fraglen, ctxt, 2);
>  	DECLARE_REG(u64, addr_mbz, ctxt, 3);
>  	DECLARE_REG(u32, npages_mbz, ctxt, 4);
> +	struct ffa_mem_region_attributes *ep_mem_access;
>  	struct ffa_composite_mem_region *reg;
>  	struct ffa_mem_region *buf;
>  	u32 offset, nr_ranges;
> @@ -452,7 +453,8 @@ static __always_inline void do_ffa_mem_xfer(const u64 func_id,
>  	buf = hyp_buffers.tx;
>  	memcpy(buf, host_buffers.tx, fraglen);
>  
> -	offset = buf->ep_mem_access[0].composite_off;
> +	ep_mem_access = (void *)buf + ffa_mem_desc_offset(buf, 0, true);
> +	offset = ep_mem_access->composite_off;
>  	if (!offset || buf->ep_count != 1 || buf->sender_id != HOST_FFA_ID) {
>  		ret = FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS;
>  		goto out_unlock;
> @@ -504,6 +506,7 @@ static void do_ffa_mem_reclaim(struct arm_smccc_res *res,
>  	DECLARE_REG(u32, handle_lo, ctxt, 1);
>  	DECLARE_REG(u32, handle_hi, ctxt, 2);
>  	DECLARE_REG(u32, flags, ctxt, 3);
> +	struct ffa_mem_region_attributes *ep_mem_access;
>  	struct ffa_composite_mem_region *reg;
>  	u32 offset, len, fraglen, fragoff;
>  	struct ffa_mem_region *buf;
> @@ -528,7 +531,8 @@ static void do_ffa_mem_reclaim(struct arm_smccc_res *res,
>  	len = res->a1;
>  	fraglen = res->a2;
>  
> -	offset = buf->ep_mem_access[0].composite_off;
> +	ep_mem_access = (void *)buf + ffa_mem_desc_offset(buf, 0, true);
> +	offset = ep_mem_access->composite_off;
>  	/*
>  	 * We can trust the SPMD to get this right, but let's at least
>  	 * check that we end up with something that doesn't look _completely_
> diff --git a/include/linux/arm_ffa.h b/include/linux/arm_ffa.h
> index 748d0a83a4bc..7be240e37f36 100644
> --- a/include/linux/arm_ffa.h
> +++ b/include/linux/arm_ffa.h
> @@ -357,6 +357,12 @@ struct ffa_mem_region {
>  #define CONSTITUENTS_OFFSET(x)	\
>  	(offsetof(struct ffa_composite_mem_region, constituents[x]))
>  
> +static inline u32
> +ffa_mem_desc_offset(struct ffa_mem_region *buf, int count, bool mem_desc_v1)
> +{
> +	return COMPOSITE_OFFSET(0);
> +}

If the goal of this patch is to introduce some versioning, why not
define this last parameter as an actual version number, PSCI style
(with a minor and major, each on a 16bit field)?

Even the name is pretty misleading, as both FFA versions are v1 (v1.0
vs v1.1...).

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-04 10:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-29 15:02 [PATCH v3 00/17] firmware: arm_ffa: Add FF-A v1.1 support(notification + new memory descriptor format) Sudeep Holla
2023-09-29 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 01/17] firmware: arm_ffa: Update the FF-A command list with v1.1 additions Sudeep Holla
2023-09-29 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 02/17] firmware: arm_ffa: Implement notification bitmap create and destroy interfaces Sudeep Holla
2023-09-29 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 03/17] firmware: arm_ffa: Implement the notification bind and unbind interface Sudeep Holla
2023-10-04  9:11   ` Jens Wiklander
2023-10-04  9:50     ` Olivier Deprez
2023-10-04 15:32       ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-05  6:57         ` Jens Wiklander
2023-10-05  8:49           ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-05  9:56             ` Jens Wiklander
2023-09-29 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 04/17] firmware: arm_ffa: Implement the FFA_RUN interface Sudeep Holla
2023-09-29 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 05/17] firmware: arm_ffa: Implement the FFA_NOTIFICATION_SET interface Sudeep Holla
2023-09-29 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 06/17] firmware: arm_ffa: Implement the FFA_NOTIFICATION_GET interface Sudeep Holla
2023-09-29 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 07/17] firmware: arm_ffa: Implement the NOTIFICATION_INFO_GET interface Sudeep Holla
2023-10-04  9:10   ` Jens Wiklander
2023-10-04 15:11     ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-05  6:30       ` Jens Wiklander
2023-09-29 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 08/17] firmware: arm_ffa: Initial support for scheduler receiver interrupt Sudeep Holla
2023-09-29 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 09/17] firmware: arm_ffa: Add schedule receiver callback mechanism Sudeep Holla
2023-09-29 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 10/17] firmware: arm_ffa: Add interfaces to request notification callbacks Sudeep Holla
2023-09-29 15:03 ` [PATCH v3 11/17] firmware: arm_ffa: Add interface to send a notification to a given partition Sudeep Holla
2023-09-29 15:03 ` [PATCH v3 12/17] firmware: arm_ffa: Add notification handling mechanism Sudeep Holla
2023-09-29 15:03 ` [PATCH v3 13/17] firmware: arm_ffa: Simplify the computation of transmit and fragment length Sudeep Holla
2023-09-29 15:03 ` [PATCH v3 14/17] KVM: arm64: FFA: Remove access of endpoint memory access descriptor array Sudeep Holla
2023-10-02 16:20   ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-04 10:08   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2023-10-04 13:22     ` Sudeep Holla
2023-09-29 15:03 ` [PATCH v3 15/17] firmware: arm_ffa: Switch to using ffa_mem_desc_offset() accessor Sudeep Holla
2023-09-29 15:03 ` [PATCH v3 16/17] firmware: arm_ffa: Update memory descriptor to support v1.1 format Sudeep Holla
2023-09-29 15:03 ` [PATCH v3 17/17] firmware: arm_ffa: Upgrade the driver version to v1.1 Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86leciog2w.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=coboy.chen@mediatek.com \
    --cc=jens.wiklander@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.bonnici@arm.com \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=olivier.deprez@arm.com \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).