Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] KVM: arm64: Store the maximum sve vector length at hyp

[Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>]

On Tue, 21 May 2024 17:37:17 +0100,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> wrote:
> 
> In subsequent patches, hyp needs to know the maximum sve vector
> length for the host, without needing the trust the host for that.
> This is used when allocating memory for the host sve state in the
> following patch, as well as for allocating and restricting guest
> sve state in a future patch series.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h  | 1 +
>  arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c              | 1 +
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c    | 2 ++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c            | 2 ++
>  5 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 8170c04fde91..0a5fceb20f3a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ static inline enum kvm_mode kvm_get_mode(void) { return KVM_MODE_NONE; };
>  DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(userspace_irqchip_in_use);
>  
>  extern unsigned int __ro_after_init kvm_sve_max_vl;
> +extern unsigned int __ro_after_init kvm_host_sve_max_vl;
>  int __init kvm_arm_init_sve(void);
>  
>  u32 __attribute_const__ kvm_target_cpu(void);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
> index 2ab23589339a..d313adf53bef 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
> @@ -143,5 +143,6 @@ extern u64 kvm_nvhe_sym(id_aa64smfr0_el1_sys_val);
>  
>  extern unsigned long kvm_nvhe_sym(__icache_flags);
>  extern unsigned int kvm_nvhe_sym(kvm_arm_vmid_bits);
> +extern unsigned int kvm_nvhe_sym(kvm_host_sve_max_vl);
>  
>  #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_HYP_H__ */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index 9996a989b52e..9e565ea3d645 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -2378,6 +2378,7 @@ static void kvm_hyp_init_symbols(void)
>  	kvm_nvhe_sym(id_aa64smfr0_el1_sys_val) = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1);
>  	kvm_nvhe_sym(__icache_flags) = __icache_flags;
>  	kvm_nvhe_sym(kvm_arm_vmid_bits) = kvm_arm_vmid_bits;
> +	kvm_nvhe_sym(kvm_host_sve_max_vl) = kvm_host_sve_max_vl;
>  }
>  
>  static int __init kvm_hyp_init_protection(u32 hyp_va_bits)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
> index 16aa4875ddb8..25e9a94f6d76 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ unsigned long __icache_flags;
>  /* Used by kvm_get_vttbr(). */
>  unsigned int kvm_arm_vmid_bits;
>  
> +unsigned int kvm_host_sve_max_vl;
> +
>  /*
>   * Set trap register values based on features in ID_AA64PFR0.
>   */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
> index 1b7b58cb121f..e818727900ec 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
> @@ -46,11 +46,13 @@ static u32 __ro_after_init kvm_ipa_limit;
>  				 PSR_AA32_I_BIT | PSR_AA32_F_BIT)
>  
>  unsigned int __ro_after_init kvm_sve_max_vl;
> +unsigned int __ro_after_init kvm_host_sve_max_vl;
>  
>  int __init kvm_arm_init_sve(void)
>  {
>  	if (system_supports_sve()) {
>  		kvm_sve_max_vl = sve_max_virtualisable_vl();
> +		kvm_host_sve_max_vl = sve_max_vl();

Why the intermediate storage?

Setting kvm_nvhe_sym(kvm_host_sve_max_vl) to sve_max_vl() should be
enough. But it doesn't mean that all the CPUs support the same max VL,
and I wonder whether we end-up with the wrong in-memory layout in this
case...

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel