From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: will@kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, alexandru.elisei@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: Do not add padding alignment for hugetlbfs backed memory
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2023 12:22:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86r0syvaj2.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230405110905.669217-1-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
On Wed, 05 Apr 2023 12:09:05 +0100,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> wrote:
>
> The arm code tries to align the memory allocation size to 2M to potentially
> make use of the transparent hugepages. But this would be problematic if we
> try to allocate from the hugetlbfs, where the allocation size could be more than
> 2M. Given we support upto 1G, let use leave it to the user to align the
> requested memory when hugetlbfs is used.
>
> Without the patch:
> $ echo 1 > /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-1048576kB/nr_hugepages
> $ mount -t hugetlbfs -o pagesize=1G none /root/hugemem/
> $ lkvm run -m 1024 --hugetlbfs /root/hugemem/ ...
> # lkvm run -k ... -m 1024 -c 6
> Fatal: Can't ftruncate for mem mapping size 1075838976
>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> ---
> arm/kvm.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arm/kvm.c b/arm/kvm.c
> index d51cc15d..9f958232 100644
> --- a/arm/kvm.c
> +++ b/arm/kvm.c
> @@ -37,7 +37,9 @@ void kvm__init_ram(struct kvm *kvm)
> * 2M trumps 64K, so let's go with that.
> */
> kvm->ram_size = kvm->cfg.ram_size;
> - kvm->arch.ram_alloc_size = kvm->ram_size + SZ_2M;
> + kvm->arch.ram_alloc_size = kvm->ram_size;
> + if (!kvm->cfg.hugetlbfs_path)
> + kvm->arch.ram_alloc_size += SZ_2M;
> kvm->arch.ram_alloc_start = mmap_anon_or_hugetlbfs(kvm,
> kvm->cfg.hugetlbfs_path,
> kvm->arch.ram_alloc_size);
Seems sensible. For hugetlbfs, we're guaranteed that the memory is
aligned, so no need for any additional alignment (which is what this
+2MB was about).
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-05 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-05 11:09 [PATCH] arm: Do not add padding alignment for hugetlbfs backed memory Suzuki K Poulose
2023-04-05 11:22 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2023-04-06 15:51 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86r0syvaj2.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).