From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware/psci: Fix MEM_PROTECT_RANGE function numbers
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2023 15:49:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86r0w9nfqc.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221125101826.22404-1-will@kernel.org>
On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 10:18:26 +0000,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> PSCI v1.1 offers 32-bit and 64-bit variants of the MEM_PROTECT_RANGE
> call using function identifier 20.
>
> Fix the incorrect definitions of the MEM_PROTECT_CHECK_RANGE calls in
> the PSCI UAPI header.
>
> Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Fixes: 3137f2e60098 ("firmware/psci: Add debugfs support to ease debugging")
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/psci.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/psci.h b/include/uapi/linux/psci.h
> index 3511095c2702..42a40ad3fb62 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/psci.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/psci.h
> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
>
> #define PSCI_1_1_FN_SYSTEM_RESET2 PSCI_0_2_FN(18)
> #define PSCI_1_1_FN_MEM_PROTECT PSCI_0_2_FN(19)
> -#define PSCI_1_1_FN_MEM_PROTECT_CHECK_RANGE PSCI_0_2_FN(19)
> +#define PSCI_1_1_FN_MEM_PROTECT_CHECK_RANGE PSCI_0_2_FN(20)
>
> #define PSCI_1_0_FN64_CPU_DEFAULT_SUSPEND PSCI_0_2_FN64(12)
> #define PSCI_1_0_FN64_NODE_HW_STATE PSCI_0_2_FN64(13)
> @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
> #define PSCI_1_0_FN64_STAT_COUNT PSCI_0_2_FN64(17)
>
> #define PSCI_1_1_FN64_SYSTEM_RESET2 PSCI_0_2_FN64(18)
> -#define PSCI_1_1_FN64_MEM_PROTECT_CHECK_RANGE PSCI_0_2_FN64(19)
> +#define PSCI_1_1_FN64_MEM_PROTECT_CHECK_RANGE PSCI_0_2_FN64(20)
>
> /* PSCI v0.2 power state encoding for CPU_SUSPEND function */
> #define PSCI_0_2_POWER_STATE_ID_MASK 0xffff
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Should this be taken via the arm64 tree, together with [1]?
Thanks,
M.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230105090834.630238-1-maz@kernel.org
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-05 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-25 10:18 [PATCH] firmware/psci: Fix MEM_PROTECT_RANGE function numbers Will Deacon
2023-01-05 15:49 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2023-01-05 15:53 ` Mark Rutland
2023-01-06 17:10 ` Will Deacon
2023-01-06 17:50 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86r0w9nfqc.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).