Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Jia He <justin.he@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Sascha Bischoff <Sascha.Bischoff@arm.com>,
	Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bin Guo <guobin@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/sysreg: Fix BWE field encoding in ID_AA64DFR2_EL1
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2026 15:29:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86v7aypyv5.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260630222347.1449737-1-justin.he@arm.com>

On Tue, 30 Jun 2026 23:23:47 +0100,
Jia He <justin.he@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> Commit 93d7356e4b30 ("arm64: sysreg: Describe ID_AA64DFR2_EL1 fields")
> encodes the FEAT_BWE2 value of the BWE field as '0b0002'. Binary
> literals only accept the digits 0 and 1, so the intended value is 2,
> i.e. 0b0010.
> 
> The macro generated by gen-sysreg.awk currently expands to
> 	#define ID_AA64DFR2_EL1_BWE_FEAT_BWE2 UL(0b0002)
> is not legal C and would fail to compile if any in-tree code referenced
> it. At present no caller uses this enum value, so the kernel still
> builds cleanly, but the bug is latent.
> 
> Fix the typo by using the correct binary literal 0b0010.
> 
> Cc: Bin Guo <guobin@linux.alibaba.com>
> Fixes: 93d7356e4b30 ("arm64: sysreg: Describe ID_AA64DFR2_EL1 fields")
> Signed-off-by: Jia He <justin.he@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/tools/sysreg | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
> index bc1788b1662b..7cb61aca3797 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
> +++ b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
> @@ -1806,7 +1806,7 @@ Res0	15:8
>  UnsignedEnum	7:4	BWE
>  	0b0000	NI
>  	0b0001	FEAT_BWE
> -	0b0002	FEAT_BWE2
> +	0b0010	FEAT_BWE2

Well, that was embarrassing. FWIW (and given the original patch,
that's not much):

Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-01 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-30 22:23 [PATCH] arm64/sysreg: Fix BWE field encoding in ID_AA64DFR2_EL1 Jia He
2026-07-01 14:29 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2026-07-01 17:09 ` Oliver Upton
2026-07-02 12:58 ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86v7aypyv5.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=Sascha.Bischoff@arm.com \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=guobin@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=justin.he@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox