From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com>,
Timothy Hayes <timothy.hayes@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] irqchip/gic-v5: iwb: Remove module boilerplate
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2025 13:24:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86v7n76xgm.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250801-gic-v5-fixes-6-17-v1-2-4fcedaccf9e6@kernel.org>
On Fri, 01 Aug 2025 08:58:19 +0100,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> The IWB driver cannot be compiled as a module and is as matter of fact a
> builtin driver at present.
What is blocking that?
>
> Make it explicitly so by removing useless boilerplate and by using the
> builtin_platform_driver() helper to initialize its registration
> functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v5-iwb.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v5-iwb.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v5-iwb.c
> index ad9fdc14d1c6..c3a3b30e9f4e 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v5-iwb.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v5-iwb.c
> @@ -263,7 +263,6 @@ static const struct of_device_id gicv5_iwb_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "arm,gic-v5-iwb" },
> { /* END */ }
> };
> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, gicv5_iwb_of_match);
>
> static struct platform_driver gicv5_iwb_platform_driver = {
> .driver = {
> @@ -274,4 +273,4 @@ static struct platform_driver gicv5_iwb_platform_driver = {
> .probe = gicv5_iwb_device_probe,
> };
>
> -module_platform_driver(gicv5_iwb_platform_driver);
> +builtin_platform_driver(gicv5_iwb_platform_driver);
>
I'd rather we make the driver buildable as a module if at all
possible, instead of forcing it as built-in for everyone. It would
definitely help pipe-cleaning the potential missing dependencies.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-01 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-01 7:58 [PATCH 0/3] irqchip/gic-v5: Minor clean-ups/fixes Lorenzo Pieralisi
2025-08-01 7:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] irqchip/gic-v5: iwb: Fix iounmap probe failure path Lorenzo Pieralisi
2025-08-01 12:26 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-08-01 7:58 ` [PATCH 2/3] irqchip/gic-v5: iwb: Remove module boilerplate Lorenzo Pieralisi
2025-08-01 12:24 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2025-08-01 14:04 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2025-08-01 7:58 ` [PATCH 3/3] irqchip/gic-v5: Remove IRQD_RESEND_WHEN_IN_PROGRESS for ITS IRQs Lorenzo Pieralisi
2025-08-01 12:30 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-08-01 14:01 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2025-08-05 9:30 ` [PATCH 0/3] irqchip/gic-v5: Minor clean-ups/fixes Lorenzo Pieralisi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86v7n76xgm.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=sascha.bischoff@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=timothy.hayes@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).