From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Don't free hyp pages with pKVM on GICv2
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 12:26:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86y0tebv6m.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250626101014.1519345-1-qperret@google.com>
On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 11:10:14 +0100,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com> wrote:
>
> Marc reported that enabling protected mode on a device with GICv2
> doesn't fail gracefully as one would expect, and leads to a host
> kernel crash.
>
> As it turns out, the first half of pKVM init happens before the vgic
> probe, and so by the time we find out we have a GICv2 we're already
> committed to keeping the pKVM vectors installed at EL2 -- pKVM rejects
> stub HVCs for obvious security reasons. However, the error path on KVM
> init leads to teardown_hyp_mode() which unconditionally frees hypervisor
> allocations (including the EL2 stacks and per-cpu pages) under the
> assumption that a previous cpu_hyp_uninit() execution has reset the
> vectors back to the stubs, which is false with pKVM.
>
> Interestingly, host stage-2 protection is not enabled yet at this point,
> so this use-after-free may go unnoticed for a while. The issue becomes
> more obvious after the finalize_pkvm() call.
>
> Fix this by keeping track of the CPUs on which pKVM is initialized in
> the kvm_hyp_initialized per-cpu variable, and use it from
> teardown_hyp_mode() to skip freeing pages that are in fact used.
>
> Fixes: a770ee80e662 ("KVM: arm64: pkvm: Disable GICv2 support")
> Reported-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
I just gave it a go on a Juno-r1, and it didn't die! Must be perfect!
:) I'll stash it on top of Mostafa's patch.
Thanks!
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-26 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-26 10:10 [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Don't free hyp pages with pKVM on GICv2 Quentin Perret
2025-06-26 11:26 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2025-06-26 11:27 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86y0tebv6m.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox