Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: nv: Set ISTATUS for emulated timers, If timer expired

[Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>]

On Mon, 09 Dec 2024 16:46:30 +0000,
Eric Auger <eauger@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 12/9/24 16:39, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 09-12-2024 06:50 pm, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >> On Mon, 09 Dec 2024 12:25:34 +0000,
> >> Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> During automated testing of Nested Virtualization using avocado-vt,
> >>>>
> >>>> Which is not merged upstream. So what branch are you using? Based on
> >>>> what kernel version? On what HW? With which virtualisation features?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Testing is done on Ampere's AmpereOne platform using 6.10 based kernel
> >>> with NV patches from your repo.
> >>
> >> Grmbl... *Which* patches? At least give me the SHA1 of the branch,
> >> because I have no idea what you are running. And 6.10 is definitely
> >> not something I care about. If you're using the NV patches, the
> >> *minimum* you should run is 6.13-rc1, because that's what the current
> >> code is based on.
> >>
> > 
> > I tried 6.13-rc1 based nv-next branch today, which failed to boot
> > UEFI as L1. Yet to debug this.
> 
> I confirm am stuck with the same issue with nv-next on AmpereOne.

All I can say is that it Works For Me (TM) on M2 and Snapdragon, using
kvmtool, a fresh EDK2 built by Ard, and with the guest running purely
VHE (FEAT_E2H0 not implemented).

I haven't tried QEMU, I don't have an AmpereOne. I have also spent way
too much time on this recently. So I'm afraid people interested in
making this particular combination work will have to debug it.

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.