linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Tangnianyao <tangnianyao@huawei.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	oliver.upton@linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	"guoyang (C)" <guoyang2@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: Question on get random long worse in VM than on host
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 09:14:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86y14dun1f.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXGocnZPe4EfzsB6xd2QZacp-a45R5f5f6FDpVtVEXCcGQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, 31 Aug 2024 08:56:23 +0100,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> As for RNDR/RNDRRS vs TRNG: the former is not a raw entropy source, it
> is a DRBG (or CSPRNG) which provides cryptographically secure random
> numbers whose security strength is limited by the size of the seed.
> TRNG does not have this limitation in principle, although non-p KVM
> happily seeds it from the kernel's entropy pool, which has the same
> limitation in practice.

Is that something we should address? I assume that this has an impact
on the quality of the provided random numbers?

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.


  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-31  8:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-31  3:34 Question on get random long worse in VM than on host Tangnianyao
2024-08-31  7:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-08-31  7:56   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-08-31  8:14     ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2024-09-02 21:26       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-09-03  1:39         ` Tangnianyao
2024-09-03 15:04           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-09-05  3:12             ` Tangnianyao
2024-09-05  8:17               ` Marc Zyngier
2024-09-06  3:42                 ` Tangnianyao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86y14dun1f.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=guoyang2@huawei.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=tangnianyao@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).