* [PATCH] irqchip/gic: Use smp_wmb() instead of dmb(ishst)
@ 2024-05-30 0:52 Samuel Holland
2024-05-30 8:59 ` Marc Zyngier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Samuel Holland @ 2024-05-30 0:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: Samuel Holland, Marc Zyngier, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
This is equivalent on ARM, but also works on other architectures.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
index 98aa383e39db..dc2e4018a40c 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
@@ -839,7 +839,7 @@ static void gic_ipi_send_mask(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask)
* Ensure that stores to Normal memory are visible to the
* other CPUs before they observe us issuing the IPI.
*/
- dmb(ishst);
+ smp_wmb();
/* this always happens on GIC0 */
writel_relaxed(map << 16 | d->hwirq, gic_data_dist_base(&gic_data[0]) + GIC_DIST_SOFTINT);
--
2.44.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] irqchip/gic: Use smp_wmb() instead of dmb(ishst)
2024-05-30 0:52 [PATCH] irqchip/gic: Use smp_wmb() instead of dmb(ishst) Samuel Holland
@ 2024-05-30 8:59 ` Marc Zyngier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2024-05-30 8:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Samuel Holland; +Cc: Thomas Gleixner, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
On Thu, 30 May 2024 01:52:30 +0100,
Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com> wrote:
>
> This is equivalent on ARM, but also works on other architectures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>
> ---
>
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> index 98aa383e39db..dc2e4018a40c 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> @@ -839,7 +839,7 @@ static void gic_ipi_send_mask(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask)
> * Ensure that stores to Normal memory are visible to the
> * other CPUs before they observe us issuing the IPI.
> */
> - dmb(ishst);
> + smp_wmb();
>
> /* this always happens on GIC0 */
> writel_relaxed(map << 16 | d->hwirq, gic_data_dist_base(&gic_data[0]) + GIC_DIST_SOFTINT);
Equivalent, sure. But what does it gain us, given that the driver is
only compiled on ARM systems?
Additionally, you may also want to address the one in the hip04
driver, which has the same dmb instruction.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-05-30 9:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-05-30 0:52 [PATCH] irqchip/gic: Use smp_wmb() instead of dmb(ishst) Samuel Holland
2024-05-30 8:59 ` Marc Zyngier
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).