From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A17E0C4708A for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 11:00:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67287613C3 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 11:00:02 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 67287613C3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Subject:Cc:To:From:Message-ID:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=A+07H1jNni633kf3EC2HkazlohK2N65fLGaPoGCj7QE=; b=xXftMAV0wXTcJ5 748N8AP7CtiOz5iHLmOZkmXfs/oWIYW/Gcx2XkvWjvn3sDIEV//9DME5BeDh7s7qjjScnICPBmXKW B+66/ejGu5beMnX9yy11d3RDh5d2A4l5glPfQgizJN6p03WxU0rXL7O9bqT9N09tZOYb2ss0dU8Qr ei20HCQC2aMQOQB5BJr9vSZu5BEROB3xULdUvnSbubcXkJf07L7MiVMsVw8xHb8zLcQijka6SXL8W SrTxyUh80W6G9/7ER+3O8IAelYhb7em9FTdV6kekg8lRFXV2gtHQPtniPd/5yiUvdy/lz3L3ktNNy 0ag7esA6FYtrlGj6HdQw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lmDip-0051Y5-LU; Thu, 27 May 2021 10:58:40 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lmDik-0051WN-LM for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 27 May 2021 10:58:36 +0000 Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4EF9260241; Thu, 27 May 2021 10:58:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 78.163-31-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk ([62.31.163.78] helo=why.misterjones.org) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1lmDih-003vO8-Bi; Thu, 27 May 2021 11:58:31 +0100 Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 11:58:30 +0100 Message-ID: <871r9stpd5.wl-maz@kernel.org> From: Marc Zyngier To: Valentin Schneider Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Gleixner , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Vincenzo Frascino Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 02/10] genirq: Define irq_ack() and irq_eoi() helpers In-Reply-To: <8735u8tphl.wl-maz@kernel.org> References: <20210525173255.620606-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com> <20210525173255.620606-3-valentin.schneider@arm.com> <8735u8tphl.wl-maz@kernel.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/27.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 62.31.163.78 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: valentin.schneider@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210527_035834_801791_67BDBEA6 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 25.98 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, 27 May 2021 11:55:50 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > On Tue, 25 May 2021 18:32:47 +0100, > Valentin Schneider wrote: > > > > The newly-added IRQCHIP_AUTOMASKS_FLOW flag requires some additional > > bookkeeping around chip->{irq_ack, irq_eoi}() calls. Define wrappers around > > those chip callbacks to drive the IRQD_IRQ_FLOW_MASKED state of an IRQ when > > the chip has the IRQCHIP_AUTOMASKS_FLOW flag. > > > > Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider > > --- > > kernel/irq/chip.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > > kernel/irq/internals.h | 2 ++ > > 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/kernel/irq/chip.c b/kernel/irq/chip.c > > index 21a21baa1366..793dbd8307b9 100644 > > --- a/kernel/irq/chip.c > > +++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c > > @@ -408,6 +408,22 @@ void irq_percpu_disable(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int cpu) > > cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, desc->percpu_enabled); > > } > > > > +void ack_irq(struct irq_desc *desc) > > +{ > > + desc->irq_data.chip->irq_ack(&desc->irq_data); > > + > > + if (desc->irq_data.chip->flags & IRQCHIP_AUTOMASKS_FLOW) > > + irq_state_set_flow_masked(desc); > > +} > > + > > +void eoi_irq(struct irq_desc *desc) > > +{ > > + desc->irq_data.chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data); > > + > > + if (desc->irq_data.chip->flags & IRQCHIP_AUTOMASKS_FLOW) > > + irq_state_clr_flow_masked(desc); > > +} > > + > > static inline void mask_ack_irq(struct irq_desc *desc) > > { > > if (desc->irq_data.chip->irq_mask_ack) { > > diff --git a/kernel/irq/internals.h b/kernel/irq/internals.h > > index b6c1cceddec0..090bd7868845 100644 > > --- a/kernel/irq/internals.h > > +++ b/kernel/irq/internals.h > > @@ -87,6 +87,8 @@ extern void irq_enable(struct irq_desc *desc); > > extern void irq_disable(struct irq_desc *desc); > > extern void irq_percpu_enable(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int cpu); > > extern void irq_percpu_disable(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int cpu); > > +extern void irq_ack(struct irq_desc *desc); > > +extern void irq_eoi(struct irq_desc *desc); > > Nit: we have {un,}mask_irq, but you add irq_{ack,eoi}. It'd be good to > have some naming consistency (yes, this may/will clash with existing > code, but we can fix that as well). Actually, the helpers do have the right naming, but the internal declarations are the ones that are wrong... M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel