From: alex.bennee@linaro.org (Alex Bennée)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 06/27] arm64/sve: System register and exception syndrome definitions
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 15:50:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871so55613.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170821142627.GQ6321@e103592.cambridge.arm.com>
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 01:34:38PM +0100, Alex Benn?e wrote:
>>
>> Alex Benn?e <alex.bennee@linaro.org> writes:
>>
>> > Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> writes:
>
> [...]
>
>> OK no I'm working directly from the unpacked ZIP file with the rest of
>> the details I think this should be:
>>
>> #define SYS_ZCR_EL2 sys_reg(3, 5, 1, 2, 0)
>>
>> e.g. op1 = 101 / 5
>
> No, that's the encoding for ZCR_EL12. Where did you get this from?
Sorry my mistake, -ETOOMANYBITTABLES....
>
> (This encoding follows the general pattern of the v8.1 Virtualization
> Host Extensions.)
>
> [...]
>
>> >> +#define ZCR_ELx_LEN_SHIFT 0
>> >> +#define ZCR_ELx_LEN_SIZE 9
>> >> +#define ZCR_ELx_LEN_MASK 0x1ff
>> >> +
>>
>> LEN should be 0/4/0xf
>>
>> LEN, bits [3:0]
>>
>> Constrains the scalable vector register length for EL1 and EL0 to
>> (LEN+1)x128 bits.
>
> The SVE supplement is not very explicit about the meaning of bits [8:4],
> but they are reserved to extend the LEN field in the future, in case
> that's ever needed for future architecture revisions. I've aimed for
> Linux to cope with this.
>
> Basically bits [8:4] are read-as-zero, write-ignore today, but in
> the future some or all of them may be LEN field bits.
>
> In particular, this means that writing all bits [8:0] with 1 will
> configure the largest supported vector length, even on future
> architecture versions that may have a larger LEN field.
Ahh ok. It's not clear from the html and it is certainly implied in the
supplement (2.1.1) that the architectural max is:
The size of every vector register is an IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED
multiple of 128 bits, up to an architectural maximum of 2048 bits.
>
> It didn't seem useful to distinguish the two classes of bits here.
Maybe a comment clarifying would be useful then?
>
> Cheers
> ---Dave
--
Alex Benn?e
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-21 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-09 12:05 [PATCH 00/27] ARM Scalable Vector Extension (SVE) Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 01/27] regset: Add support for dynamically sized regsets Dave Martin
2017-08-18 11:52 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 02/27] arm64: KVM: Hide unsupported AArch64 CPU features from guests Dave Martin
2017-08-16 11:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-08-16 20:32 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-17 8:45 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-08-17 9:57 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 03/27] arm64: efi: Add missing Kconfig dependency on KERNEL_MODE_NEON Dave Martin
2017-08-18 12:02 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 04/27] arm64: Port deprecated instruction emulation to new sysctl interface Dave Martin
2017-08-18 12:09 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 05/27] arm64: fpsimd: Simplify uses of {set, clear}_ti_thread_flag() Dave Martin
2017-08-15 17:11 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-18 16:36 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 06/27] arm64/sve: System register and exception syndrome definitions Dave Martin
2017-08-21 9:33 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-21 12:34 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-21 14:26 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-21 14:50 ` Alex Bennée [this message]
2017-08-21 15:19 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-21 15:34 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-21 13:56 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-21 14:36 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 07/27] arm64/sve: Low-level SVE architectural state manipulation functions Dave Martin
2017-08-21 10:11 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-21 14:38 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 08/27] arm64/sve: Kconfig update and conditional compilation support Dave Martin
2017-08-21 10:12 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 09/27] arm64/sve: Signal frame and context structure definition Dave Martin
2017-08-22 10:22 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-22 11:17 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-22 13:53 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-22 14:21 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-22 15:03 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-22 15:41 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 10/27] arm64/sve: Low-level CPU setup Dave Martin
2017-08-22 15:04 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-22 15:33 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 11/27] arm64/sve: Core task context handling Dave Martin
2017-08-15 17:31 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-16 10:40 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-17 16:42 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-17 16:46 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-22 16:21 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-22 17:19 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-22 18:39 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 12/27] arm64/sve: Support vector length resetting for new processes Dave Martin
2017-08-22 16:22 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-22 17:22 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 13/27] arm64/sve: Signal handling support Dave Martin
2017-08-23 9:38 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-23 11:30 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 14/27] arm64/sve: Backend logic for setting the vector length Dave Martin
2017-08-23 15:33 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-23 17:29 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 15/27] arm64/sve: Probe SVE capabilities and usable vector lengths Dave Martin
2017-08-16 17:48 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-08-17 10:04 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-17 10:46 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 16/27] arm64/sve: Preserve SVE registers around kernel-mode NEON use Dave Martin
2017-08-15 17:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 17/27] arm64/sve: Preserve SVE registers around EFI runtime service calls Dave Martin
2017-08-15 17:44 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-16 9:13 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 18/27] arm64/sve: ptrace and ELF coredump support Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 19/27] arm64/sve: Add prctl controls for userspace vector length management Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 20/27] arm64/sve: Add sysctl to set the default vector length for new processes Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 21/27] arm64/sve: KVM: Prevent guests from using SVE Dave Martin
2017-08-15 16:33 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-08-16 10:50 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-16 11:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-08-16 11:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-08-16 11:35 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 22/27] arm64/sve: KVM: Treat guest SVE use as undefined instruction execution Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 23/27] arm64/sve: KVM: Hide SVE from CPU features exposed to guests Dave Martin
2017-08-15 16:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-08-16 10:54 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-16 11:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-08-16 11:22 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 24/27] arm64/sve: Detect SVE and activate runtime support Dave Martin
2017-08-16 17:53 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-08-17 10:00 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 25/27] arm64/sve: Add documentation Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [RFC PATCH 26/27] arm64: signal: Report signal frame size to userspace via auxv Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [RFC PATCH 27/27] arm64/sve: signal: Include SVE when computing AT_MINSIGSTKSZ Dave Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871so55613.fsf@linaro.org \
--to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).