From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: robert.jarzmik@free.fr (Robert Jarzmik)
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 22:38:54 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/4] mfd: lubbock_cplds: add lubbock IO board
In-Reply-To: <20150325140725.GA11499@kroah.com> (Greg Kroah-Hartman's message
 of "Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:07:25 +0100")
References: <20150216130549.GF14545@x1>
 <1170550770.470129293.1424093248596.JavaMail.root@zimbra1-e1.priv.proxad.net>
 <20150216162712.GR14545@x1> <87fva5a4i2.fsf@free.fr>
 <20150217074310.GT14545@x1>
 <alpine.LFD.2.11.1502171221300.22104@knanqh.ubzr>
 <20150218080719.GB5781@x1> <87a9088tam.fsf@free.fr>
 <20150325140725.GA11499@kroah.com>
Message-ID: <871tkbxwup.fsf@free.fr>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes:

> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:02:57PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>> If there is no solution, I'll fallback through arch/arm/plat-pxa, not very nice,
>> but it has to land somewhere, I don't want lubbock to remain broken.
>
> drivers/platform/arm ?
Most certainly.

I'll submit that to drivers/platform/arm/pxa, and maintain that pxa tree. As for
drivers/platform/arm, do you want also maintainers to step up, or will you take
the review/merge burden ?

Cheers.

-- 
Robert