From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: robert.jarzmik@free.fr (Robert Jarzmik)
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 13:45:21 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] serial: rewrite pxa2xx-uart to use 8250_core
References: <1387309071-22382-1-git-send-email-ynvich@gmail.com>
 <1449700088-28076-1-git-send-email-ynvich@gmail.com>
 <1449700088-28076-2-git-send-email-ynvich@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <8737uyhaji.fsf@belgarion.home>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Sergei Ianovich <ynvich@gmail.com> writes:

> pxa2xx-uart was a separate uart platform driver. It was declaring
> the same device names and numbers as 8250 driver. As a result,
> it was impossible to use 8250 driver on PXA SoCs.
>
> Upon closer examination pxa2xx-uart turned out to be a clone of
> 8250_core driver.
>
> Workaround for Erratum #19 according to Marvel(R) PXA270M Processor
> Specification Update (April 19, 2010) is dropped. 8250_core reads
> from FIFO immediately after checking DR bit in LSR.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergei Ianovich <ynvich@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: James Cameron <quozl@laptop.org>
> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Tested-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>

I was wondering if this should go through pxa tree, or through serial tree ?

Cheers.

--
Robert