From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:19:40 -0700 Subject: [PATCH/RFT 5/8] ARM: OMAP: clock: remove unused CK_3505 flag In-Reply-To: (Jean Pihet's message of "Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:05:41 +0200") References: <1335482993-14035-1-git-send-email-khilman@ti.com> <1335482993-14035-6-git-send-email-khilman@ti.com> Message-ID: <87397lw30z.fsf@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Jean Pihet writes: > Hi Kevin, > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> This flag is no longer used since clock init all AM35x devices >> is now the same. >> >> Acked-by: Vaibhav Hiremath >> Tested-by: Vaibhav Hiremath >> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman >> --- >> ?arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/clkdev_omap.h | ? ?3 +-- >> ?1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/clkdev_omap.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/clkdev_omap.h >> index b299b8d..45afa4d 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/clkdev_omap.h >> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/clkdev_omap.h >> @@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ struct omap_clk { >> ?#define CK_243X ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?(1 << 5) ? ? ? ?/* 243x, 253x */ >> ?#define CK_3430ES1 ? ? (1 << 6) ? ? ? ?/* 34xxES1 only */ >> ?#define CK_3430ES2PLUS (1 << 7) ? ? ? ?/* 34xxES2, ES3, non-Sitara 35xx only */ >> -#define CK_3505 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?(1 << 8) >> ?#define CK_3517 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?(1 << 9) > If this is the only flag remaining, should it better be renamed to CK_35XX? That happens later in the series. Kevin