Re: [ISSUE + PATCH] Interrupts were enabled early by spinlock guard

[Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>]

On Sat, Aug 23 2025 at 21:33, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14 2025 at 17:28, Edgar Bonet wrote:
>>> I think the conversions in
>>> drivers/irqchip/irq-atmel-aic.c:aic_irq_domain_xlate() and
>>> drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-liointc.c:liointc_set_type()
>>> are also wrong, and need a similar change.
>
>> The one in irq-atmel-aic.c looks indeed strikingly similar.
>
> Yes. My bad.
>
> I missed the fact, that this can be invoked during early boot when
> interrupts are still disabled. After early boot they are always enabled
> when xlate() is invoked.
>
>> The one in irq-loongson-liointc.c is slightly different
>> though. Instead of:
>>
>>     irq_gc_lock_irqsave() -> guard(raw_spinlock_irq)
>>
>> it does:
>>
>>     irq_gc_lock_irqsave() -> guard(raw_spinlock)
>>
>> I don't know what the implications are though.
>
> That's in the set_type() callback which is always invoked with the
> interrupt decriptor lock held and interrupts disabled, so doing the
> 'save/restore' dance there is pointless.
>
> Can you send a patch for that atmel-aic thing too please?

Nah. Let me just fold it into your patch and be done with it.