linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>,
	Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/13] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Work around broken CVAL implementations
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 14:15:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874kbxbfvt.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210810123407.GB52842@C02TD0UTHF1T.local>

On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 13:34:07 +0100,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 04:26:46PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > The Applied Micro XGene-1 SoC has a busted implementation of the
> > CVAL register: it looks like it is based on TVAL instead of the
> > other way around. The net effect of this implementation blunder
> > is that the maximum deadline you can program in the timer is
> > 32bit wide.
> > 
> > Detect the problematic case and limit the timer to 32bit deltas.
> > Note that we don't tie this bug to XGene specifically, as it may
> > also catch similar defects on other high-quality implementations.
> 
> Do we know of any other implementations that have a similar bug?
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> > index 895844c33351..1c596cd3cc5c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> > @@ -778,9 +778,42 @@ static int arch_timer_set_next_event_phys_mem(unsigned long evt,
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static u64 __arch_timer_check_delta(void)
> > +{
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
> > +	u64 tmp;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * XGene-1 implements CVAL in terms of TVAL, meaning that the
> > +	 * maximum timer range is 32bit. Shame on them. Detect the
> > +	 * issue by setting a timer to now+(1<<32), which will
> > +	 * immediately fire on the duff CPU.
> > +	 */
> > +	write_sysreg(0, cntv_ctl_el0);
> > +	isb();
> > +	tmp = read_sysreg(cntvct_el0) | BIT(32);
> > +	write_sysreg(tmp, cntv_cval_el0);
> 
> This will fire on legitimate implementations fairly often. Consider if
> we enter this function at a time where CNTCVT_EL0[32] == 1, where:
> 
> * At 100MHz, bit 32 flips every ~42.95
> * At 200MHz, bit 32 flips every ~21.47
> * At 1GHz, bit 32 flips every ~4.29s
> 
> ... and ThunderX2 has a 200MHz frequency today, with SBSA recommending
> 100MHz.

Yup, you're right, this is silly. Orr-ing the bit is a bad enough bug
(it really should be a +), but also preemption in a guest will add
another set of false positives.

> What does XGene-1 return upon a read of CVAL? If it always returns 0 for
> the high bits, we could do a timing-insensitive check for truncation of
> CVAL, e.g.
> 
> | 	/* CVAL must be at least 56 bits wide, as with CNT */
> | 	u64 mask = GENMASK(55, 0);
> | 	u64 val;
> | 
> | 	write_sysreg(mask, cntv_cval_el0);
> | 	val = read_sysread(cnt_cval_el0);
> | 
> | 	if (val != mask) {
> | 		/* What a great CPU */
> | 	}

No, the register itself returns what has been written. But only the
low 32bits of the delta trickle into TVAL on write, which is then used
as a countdown. I guess I could play the same trick as above with a
higher bit, but it still is pretty unreliable, as it could then wrap
through 0.

Maybe I'll just check the MIDR in the end...

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-10 13:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-09 15:26 [PATCH 00/13] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Add basic ARMv8.6 support Marc Zyngier
2021-08-09 15:26 ` [PATCH 01/13] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Drop CNT*_TVAL read accessors Marc Zyngier
2021-08-11  7:02   ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-24 16:20   ` Mark Rutland
2021-08-09 15:26 ` [PATCH 02/13] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Extend write side of timer register accessors to u64 Marc Zyngier
2021-08-09 16:12   ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-24 16:20   ` Mark Rutland
2021-08-09 15:26 ` [PATCH 03/13] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Move system register timer programming over to CVAL Marc Zyngier
2021-08-11  7:15   ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-24 16:21   ` Mark Rutland
2021-08-09 15:26 ` [PATCH 04/13] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Move drop _tval from erratum function names Marc Zyngier
2021-08-09 16:16   ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-24 16:29   ` Mark Rutland
2021-08-09 15:26 ` [PATCH 05/13] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Fix MMIO base address vs callback ordering issue Marc Zyngier
2021-08-09 16:52   ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-10  8:27     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-08-24 16:44   ` Mark Rutland
2021-08-09 15:26 ` [PATCH 06/13] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Move MMIO timer programming over to CVAL Marc Zyngier
2021-08-09 15:26 ` [PATCH 07/13] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Advertise 56bit timer to the core code Marc Zyngier
2021-08-09 15:26 ` [PATCH 08/13] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Work around broken CVAL implementations Marc Zyngier
2021-08-10 12:34   ` Mark Rutland
2021-08-10 13:15     ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2021-08-09 15:26 ` [PATCH 09/13] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Remove any trace of the TVAL programming interface Marc Zyngier
2021-08-09 15:26 ` [PATCH 10/13] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Drop unnecessary ISB on CVAL programming Marc Zyngier
2021-08-09 15:26 ` [PATCH 11/13] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Fix masking for high freq counters Marc Zyngier
2021-08-09 16:45   ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-10  8:40     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-08-10  9:09       ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-09 15:26 ` [PATCH 12/13] arm64: Add a capability for FEAT_EVC Marc Zyngier
2021-08-09 16:30   ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-09 16:34     ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-09 18:02     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-08-09 18:21       ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-09 18:23         ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-09 15:26 ` [PATCH 13/13] arm64: Add CNT{P, V}CTSS_EL0 alternatives to cnt{p, v}ct_el0 Marc Zyngier
2021-08-09 16:42   ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-09 18:11     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-08-09 18:17       ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-10  7:59         ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874kbxbfvt.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=oupton@google.com \
    --cc=pshier@google.com \
    --cc=rananta@google.com \
    --cc=ricarkol@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).