From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC88C433E6 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:06:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06E1060190 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:06:45 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 06E1060190 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding :Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To: From:Message-ID:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=lXtoxpOrST1GMsM5R+W7fiySxuyL5zDv5jAHk+bBkA8=; b=dImg0XKCs5q69JzZqMLy3D4rq 5b6aIbZQ2zfJJNRswiB66ixlaPwXaMqyBzhtdOhYqxV4VNw01iN2i5esEwAokbekFH9tmT4FyOjJk XSTy+pHvusCZMetrt1JOB46EtC4E06myvQf5Kpk+o5DLCBiJgThcwizVGW/HPrJrCzQMpfQcdwwN1 0GAFBCDc2vlBP/f+f0OKuAjkOp7EHfKXJ3mVvj2RITk6HimG46EGUlbkCe3ug+11RymDuBqzmhBMK 9PRaUU6YvfO7xY1ln3qitVeuqqrb0D1y6Xg//hCsGcD3azstQqU3YMDrsc+eljw/tQW5tTXRicZ58 yHyi9RliQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=desiato.infradead.org) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lK1Kv-007AZS-Fy; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:05:25 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lK1Kr-007AZ4-Np for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:05:23 +0000 Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FE3664EFC; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:05:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 78.163-31-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk ([62.31.163.78] helo=why.misterjones.org) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1lK1Ko-000nb7-A6; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:05:18 +0000 Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:05:17 +0000 Message-ID: <874khjxade.wl-maz@kernel.org> From: Marc Zyngier To: Will Deacon Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, James Morse , Julien Thierry , Suzuki K Poulose , Mark Rutland , qperret@google.com, kernel-team@android.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: arm64: Rename SCTLR_ELx_FLAGS to SCTLR_EL2_FLAGS In-Reply-To: <20210310154625.GA29738@willie-the-truck> References: <20210310152656.3821253-1-maz@kernel.org> <20210310152656.3821253-4-maz@kernel.org> <20210310154625.GA29738@willie-the-truck> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/27.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 62.31.163.78 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: will@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, james.morse@arm.com, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, qperret@google.com, kernel-team@android.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210310_160522_011889_093CD7B6 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 25.86 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:46:26 +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 03:26:55PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > Only the nVHE EL2 code is using this define, so let's make it > > plain that it is EL2 only. > > > > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier > > --- > > arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 2 +- > > arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S | 2 +- > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h > > index dfd4edbfe360..9d1aef631646 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h > > @@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ > > #define SCTLR_ELx_A (BIT(1)) > > #define SCTLR_ELx_M (BIT(0)) > > > > -#define SCTLR_ELx_FLAGS (SCTLR_ELx_M | SCTLR_ELx_A | SCTLR_ELx_C | \ > > +#define SCTLR_EL2_FLAGS (SCTLR_ELx_M | SCTLR_ELx_A | SCTLR_ELx_C | \ > > SCTLR_ELx_SA | SCTLR_ELx_I | SCTLR_ELx_IESB) > > > > /* SCTLR_EL2 specific flags. */ > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S > > index 4eb584ae13d9..7423f4d961a4 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S > > @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif > > * as well as the EE bit on BE. Drop the A flag since the compiler > > * is allowed to generate unaligned accesses. > > */ > > - mov_q x0, (SCTLR_EL2_RES1 | (SCTLR_ELx_FLAGS & ~SCTLR_ELx_A)) > > + mov_q x0, (SCTLR_EL2_RES1 | (SCTLR_EL2_FLAGS & ~SCTLR_ELx_A)) > > Can we just drop SCTLR_ELx_A from SCTLR_EL2_FLAGS instead of clearing it > here? Absolutely. That'd actually be an improvement. Thanks, M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel