From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: robert.jarzmik@free.fr (Robert Jarzmik) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 15:18:11 +0100 Subject: [GIT PULL RESEND] pxa for v3.20 In-Reply-To: <20150123215423.GD20896@quad.lixom.net> (Olof Johansson's message of "Fri, 23 Jan 2015 13:54:23 -0800") References: <87egqpff9m.fsf@free.fr> <20150123215423.GD20896@quad.lixom.net> Message-ID: <874mrgdzz0.fsf@free.fr> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Olof Johansson writes: > Hi Robert, > > Branch looks good, I'll merge this into next/fixes-non-critical. One nit below > though: > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov (3): >> ARM: pxa: add regulator_has_full_constraints to corgi board file >> ARM: pxa: add regulator_has_full_constraints to poodle board file >> ARM: pxa: add regulator_has_full_constraints to spitz board file >> >> Martin Vajnar (1): >> hx4700: regulator: declare full constraints > > Please use consistent patch subjects in the future. We've ended up using ARM: > : across all platforms these days. > > I'm not going to ask you to respin just for this, but please remember to fix > future patches when you apply them if they're not already correct. You're right, I missed that one. In case you've not already pulled, I created : https://github.com/rjarzmik/linux.git tags/pxa-for-3.20-bis I can resend a proper pull request if you wish, or we can leave it as is if you already pulled. In any case I'll be more carefull next time, maybe I can convince my bot to check that for me too. Or even better checkpatch could check that any patch with a diffstat fully in arch/arm/{mach,plat}- has a subject beginning with "ARM: XYZ: ", that would be cool, and put the burden on others as well :) Cheers. -- Robert