From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: khilman@linaro.org (Kevin Hilman) Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 10:38:58 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] arm: Fix build error with context tracking calls In-Reply-To: (Frederic Weisbecker's message of "Sun, 22 Sep 2013 11:59:35 -0500") References: <522CB0DE.2010102@roeck-us.net> <20130909105115.GL25647@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <522DB86A.8010207@roeck-us.net> <20130909160348.GB18975@roeck-us.net> <20130909203141.GM25647@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130909210203.GC28416@roeck-us.net> <87y574g1fi.fsf@linaro.org> <20130913170331.GA8453@somewhere> <20130914143213.GN25647@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <874n986bt9.fsf@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Frederic Weisbecker writes: > 2013/9/14, Russell King - ARM Linux : >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 07:03:34PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: >>> diff --git a/kernel/context_tracking.c b/kernel/context_tracking.c >>> index 247091b..859c8df 100644 >>> --- a/kernel/context_tracking.c >>> +++ b/kernel/context_tracking.c >>> @@ -51,6 +51,15 @@ void context_tracking_user_enter(void) >>> unsigned long flags; >>> >>> /* >>> + * Repeat the user_enter() check here because some archs may be calling >>> + * this from asm and if no CPU needs context tracking, they shouldn't >>> + * go further. We can remove that check here once these archs support >>> the static key >>> + * check. >> >> The only (minor) comment on this is that the above would fail checkpatch, >> but that's not a good enough reason to respin it if you've already applied >> it IMHO. >> > > Ah I haven't yet pushed that patch anywhere so I can definetly fix > that. Thanks for the review. BTW, I initially first thought this fix > could go through your tree but if you prefer I can push it through > Ingo to the context tracking bits. > > Just tell me either way. Frederic, I suggest you queue it directly for v3.12-rc. Thanks, Kevin