linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: khilman@linaro.org (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: OMAP4: PM: Avoid expensive cpu_suspend() path for all CPU power states except off
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:42:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874ngfrybz.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <513DBB60.3010406@ti.com> (Santosh Shilimkar's message of "Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:39:20 +0530")

Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> writes:

> Kevin,
>
> On Wednesday 13 February 2013 02:25 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> Current CPU PM code code make use of common cpu_suspend() path for all the
>> CPU power states which is not optimal. In fact cpu_suspend() path is needed
>> only when we put CPU power domain to off state where the CPU context is lost.
>> 
>> Update the code accordingly so that the expensive cpu_suspend() path
>> can be avoided for the shallow CPU power states like CPU PD INA/CSWR.
>> 
>> The patch has been tested on OMAP4430 and OMAP5430(with few out of tree patches)
>> devices for suspend and CPUidle.
>> 
>> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
>> 
>> Reported-by: Richard Woodruff <r-woodruff2@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
>> ---
>> Update changelog to include testing details as suggested
>> by Kevin Hilman.
>> 
> Ping.
> It can get into rc's but since it is not strict regression,
> and if it has to wait for 3.10 then I can add this one
> along with rest of the PM patches posted towards 3.10
>
> Either way, let me know.

I have this updated one queued for v3.10 in my PM cleanup branch
(for_3.10/cleanup/pm)

Kevin

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-13 17:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-13  8:55 [PATCH v2] ARM: OMAP4: PM: Avoid expensive cpu_suspend() path for all CPU power states except off Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-11 11:09 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-13 17:42   ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2013-03-14  6:08     ` Santosh Shilimkar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874ngfrybz.fsf@linaro.org \
    --to=khilman@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).