From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/6] OMAP: omap_device: Create a default omap_device_pm_latency
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:41:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8762kssam2.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E73387B.2030403@ti.com> (Benoit Cousson's message of "Fri, 16 Sep 2011 13:52:27 +0200")
"Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com> writes:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> On 9/2/2011 4:25 PM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
>> Most devices are using the same default omap_device_pm_latency structure
>> during device built. In order to avoid the duplication of the same
>> structure everywhere, add a default structure that will be used if
>> the device does not have an explicit one.
>
> [...]
>
>> - od->pm_lats = pm_lats;
>> - od->pm_lats_cnt = pm_lats_cnt;
>> + if (pm_lats) {
>> + od->pm_lats = pm_lats;
>> + od->pm_lats_cnt = pm_lats_cnt;
>> + } else {
>> + od->pm_lats = omap_default_latency;
>> + od->pm_lats_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(omap_default_latency);
>> + }
>
> Here is the fix for that part. I did the easy version :-). Splitting
> the structure in two parts will indeed require more work.
The kmemdup() method is fine with me.
> I updated the for_3.2/1_omap_device_cleanup branch.
Thanks, I'll pick these into my branch (which is now renamed to
for_3.2/omap_device-cleanup)
Kevin
> Regards,
> Benoit
>
> ---
> From ad163000568dd61dee441473d0a576d84152da9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
> Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 16:54:19 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH v3 5/6] OMAP: omap_device: Create a default omap_device_pm_latency
>
> Most devices are using the same default omap_device_pm_latency structure
> during device built. In order to avoid the duplication of the same
> structure everywhere, add a default structure that will be used if
> the device does not have an explicit one.
>
> Next patches will clean the duplicated structures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c
> index 7b2cf62..54bbe7b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c
> @@ -97,6 +97,14 @@
> static int omap_device_register(struct platform_device *pdev);
> static int omap_early_device_register(struct platform_device *pdev);
>
> +static struct omap_device_pm_latency omap_default_latency[] = {
> + {
> + .deactivate_func = omap_device_idle_hwmods,
> + .activate_func = omap_device_enable_hwmods,
> + .flags = OMAP_DEVICE_LATENCY_AUTO_ADJUST,
> + }
> +};
> +
> /* Private functions */
>
> /**
> @@ -510,8 +518,17 @@ struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id,
> if (ret)
> goto odbs_exit3;
>
> - od->pm_lats = pm_lats;
> + if (!pm_lats) {
> + pm_lats = omap_default_latency;
> + pm_lats_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(omap_default_latency);
> + }
> +
> od->pm_lats_cnt = pm_lats_cnt;
> + od->pm_lats = kmemdup(pm_lats,
> + sizeof(struct omap_device_pm_latency) * pm_lats_cnt,
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!od->pm_lats)
> + goto odbs_exit3;
>
> for (i = 0; i < oh_cnt; i++) {
> hwmods[i]->od = od;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-16 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-02 14:25 [PATCH v2 0/6] OMAP: omap_device cleanup before device-tree integration Benoit Cousson
2011-09-02 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] OMAP: omap_device: Add omap_hwmod_name_get_dev Benoit Cousson
2011-09-26 18:24 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-02 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] OMAP3: beagle-board: Use the omap_hwmod_name_get_dev API Benoit Cousson
2011-09-02 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] OMAP2+: pm: Use hwmod name instead of dev pointer Benoit Cousson
2011-09-02 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] OMAP2+: pm: Remove static devices variable for mpu, dsp, iva and l3 PM Benoit Cousson
2011-09-02 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] OMAP: omap_device: Create a default omap_device_pm_latency Benoit Cousson
2011-09-16 11:52 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-16 16:41 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2011-09-02 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] OMAP2+: devices: Remove all omap_device_pm_latency structures Benoit Cousson
2011-09-26 22:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] OMAP: omap_device cleanup before device-tree integration Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8762kssam2.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).