From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD07AC433F5 for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 13:39:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=x3s9ubGeO0WZHA4vIVyOo3D7nWoT0VX74LH9hjwBCws=; b=noKYSHPPeDeimk n6freU9/2dSK9IBS/aIB7eEo3pJwkNBQnLwO9rrjgrm+09yyqCcvEclse/lOcfnO/lWqQy9OvFWMw qjIviuBYo9PNWCx0ZJqC+SX76U4DwprXawAYp8zWyn6soDnhEOnYYhpjYz4MDXl5OAVfToNRMOAcF Woo0YCYOzBKeggjcrvJok9bFEGyOe/dly6np3TDoOQSeQ7XtMc0UVf+bbMwfaLK7SxUBQWBt9ljL3 kix1Y7aSZm2WgXMStC5waBxFBDM0m/DcvAcdb2nptfSVqhlGufpAaAEgEEOSFyKriuewQpxfFF543 hLjTwaN0lZlGWIiATTtg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nBd4T-000sji-Um; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 13:38:18 +0000 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([185.11.138.130]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nBd4O-000shp-Ao; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 13:38:13 +0000 Received: from p508fcdea.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([80.143.205.234] helo=phil.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nBd4J-0004q2-V2; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 14:38:07 +0100 From: Heiko Stuebner To: Frank Wunderlich Cc: Peter Geis , Johan Jonker , Frank Wunderlich , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , Rob Herring , devicetree , arm-mail-list , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Aw: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] dts64: rk3568: drop pclk_xpcs from gmac0 Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 14:38:09 +0100 Message-ID: <8763546.c4FMd9deqZ@phil> In-Reply-To: References: <20220116124911.65203-1-linux@fw-web.de> <236548630.RelmrRfzIS@diego> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220123_053812_393573_3F116CCE X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.25 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Frank, Am Samstag, 22. Januar 2022, 15:50:25 CET schrieb Frank Wunderlich: > i plan to send a v2 of the series after 5.17-rc1 is out, because i have n= ow verified > the functions from gpio header and found some pinctrl-changes. V1 had onl= y prepared > the nodes to know which devices are present on this header. > = > should i include this patch again or do you pull it from v1 (maybe as fix= )? I do plan to include this as fix after -rc1, but I just saw that you alread= y sent a separate patch of it, so I'll take that one instead :-) Heiko > = > regards Frank > = > = > > Gesendet: Montag, 17. Januar 2022 um 22:05 Uhr > > Von: "Heiko St=FCbner" > = > > From looking at the documentation I got the impression that the > > pclk_xpcs is related to the separate qsgmii_pcs in the memory map. > > = > > So yes, I fully agree to dropping this clock from here and then adding > > them to whatever ip block really needs it. > = _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel