From: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] firmware: arm_scmi: Refactoring and enablement of ACPI PCC transport
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2025 11:04:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877bv3n7x2.fsf@stealth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251126-camouflaged-delightful-cuckoo-ddeac8@sudeepholla> (Sudeep Holla's message of "Wed, 26 Nov 2025 14:31:30 +0000")
Hi Sudeep,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 11:49:38AM +0000, Punit Agrawal wrote:
>> Hi Sudeep,
>>
>> Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> writes:
>>
>> > The SCMI can be utilized in systems using either the FDT or ACPI specification.
>> > While FDT-based systems can natively use SCMI, ACPI-based systems often
>> > need to abstract the functionality provided by SCMI under ASL methods.
>> > So far, there has been no need to support SCMI natively on ACPI systems.
>> >
>> > However, with the addition of a few new protocols such as Powercap and Telemetry,
>> > which lack abstractions in the ACPI specification, there is now a need to
>> > run SCMI natively for those use cases.
>> >
>> > This patch series introduces ACPI PCC transport support for the Arm SCMI
>> > framework, alongside several foundational refactors and enhancements to
>> > achieve firmware-node neutrality between Device Tree (DT) and ACPI systems.
>> >
>> > The key changes include:
>> >
>> > 1. ACPI/DT abstraction and fwnode transition
>> >
>> > Converted the core SCMI code to use `fwnode_handle` instead of DT-specific
>> > structures, ensuring seamless operation across both ACPI and DT
>> > environments. All property lookups, child enumeration, and device
>> > association paths have been updated accordingly.
>> >
>> > 2. Unified transport registration for ACPI and DT
>> >
>> > Extended the SCMI transport driver macros to support ACPI match tables,
>> > enabling transports to probe using ACPI device IDs while maintaining
>> > backward compatibility with DT-only systems.
>> >
>> > 3. Protocol device initialization and refactoring
>> >
>> > Refactored the protocol device creation and validation logic into a new
>> > helper for improved readability and maintainability. Enhanced the
>> > initialization logic to handle ACPI-based SCMI devices without explicit
>> > child fwnodes.
>> >
>> > 4. Introduction of ACPI PCC transport
>> >
>> > Added a new SCMI transport driver leveraging ACPI PCCT (Platform
>> > Communications Channel Table) subspaces via the Linux PCC mailbox
>> > framework. This enables SCMI communication over PCC on ACPI-based
>> > platforms.
>> >
>> > Collectively, these changes lay the groundwork for robust SCMI operation on
>> > ACPI platforms, achieving near parity with DT systems where applicable,
>> > while enabling the new PCC transport path for firmware communication.
>>
>> I was interested in taking a closer look at the patches here but they
>> have a dependency on support for the telemetry protocol patches. I get a
>> compile error.
>>
>> I was wondering if you have a branch with the dependencies included. Are
>> the v1 telemetry support patches[0] the right version to be using?
>>
>
> I can create one but that is not strictly necessary. As mentioned in the
> cover letter, the only dependency is on value of SCMI_PROTOCOL_TELEMETRY
> ins `scmi_std_protocol` enumeration. Just add one and you must be able to
> compile the series independent of Cristian series.
Thanks, I managed to get the patches building. Looking forward to the
series progressing. If possible, do keep me in the loop for future
updates.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-03 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-17 13:23 [PATCH 0/8] firmware: arm_scmi: Refactoring and enablement of ACPI PCC transport Sudeep Holla
2025-10-17 13:23 ` [PATCH 1/8] firmware: arm_scmi: Set fwnode for the genrated SCMI platform device Sudeep Holla
2025-10-20 17:07 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-21 9:03 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-10-17 13:23 ` [PATCH 2/8] firmware: arm_scmi: Extend transport driver macro to support ACPI Sudeep Holla
2025-10-20 17:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-21 9:06 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-10-17 13:23 ` [PATCH 3/8] firmware: arm_scmi: Convert OF-only paths to generic fwnode in SCMI core Sudeep Holla
2025-10-20 17:29 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-21 9:26 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-10-17 13:23 ` [PATCH 4/8] firmware: arm_scmi: Fall back to ACPI HID when "compatible" is absent Sudeep Holla
2025-10-17 13:23 ` [PATCH 5/8] firmware: arm_scmi: Pass protocol ID to chan_available() transport callback Sudeep Holla
2025-10-17 13:23 ` [PATCH 6/8] firmware: arm_scmi: Refactor protocol device creation logic Sudeep Holla
2025-10-17 13:23 ` [PATCH 7/8] firmware: arm_scmi: transport: Add ACPI PCC transport Sudeep Holla
2025-10-20 8:20 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-10-20 8:47 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-10-20 17:37 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-21 9:30 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-10-17 13:23 ` [PATCH 8/8] firmware: arm_scmi: Initialise all protocol devices and transport channels Sudeep Holla
2025-11-05 11:49 ` [PATCH 0/8] firmware: arm_scmi: Refactoring and enablement of ACPI PCC transport Punit Agrawal
2025-11-26 14:31 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-12-03 11:04 ` Punit Agrawal [this message]
2025-12-03 15:21 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-12-04 18:25 ` Punit Agrawal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877bv3n7x2.fsf@stealth \
--to=punit.agrawal@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).