From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A6EDCAC587 for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2025 15:49:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type:MIME-Version: Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=UuMEMPuykm7rNGqGRgSYCtjd+uJaJUQH41mpXqr8O2w=; b=2Byww+qF3gOSIJYu+5jjK760UK bXhwOS2tsaZ+qEKaH4oXxaUVEsj4d1OpQUx8ObUU57LzPdVaBm2tuakZy8k+cmiPQRjoYN+pY+Tn3 Z1kLeQLSpf1MnTpFgk2+44aVreLVMDZ/9e2emduq3wvLXallMwf2bpDJHClbyryXTABymiByt3Hzu fqjCcMXLilh2Qh4vUpQZj81dKEzGUS5uKDoFamoptELwXUxveMkbTgbRNzeXT1hnQQJM9FQnHSExk 3lYoDbM/pFC9zjJrJ+G7cpMcSXH+N4RRi9oViRpl1Dfncm3JOCzu1Ckgv6k89ETW6eVGSglJpuAVO gM8dga4g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uwjYO-00000003zg5-25Am; Thu, 11 Sep 2025 15:49:44 +0000 Received: from galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uwjYL-00000003zf5-45Np for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 11 Sep 2025 15:49:43 +0000 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1757605777; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UuMEMPuykm7rNGqGRgSYCtjd+uJaJUQH41mpXqr8O2w=; b=Gv/J/Im1CRWyw9bIl8PD4nIFLIoBpCCDS8ViJW4a1/U8I1LoLfawuDNMYSQQJlnOXxL6xn OuskPZs1HqkU7fAUh+M5SxMFwGSCzu+glLIkiXNQ9BTxWi41a/3yDUGqqQzW6hvqvGbvxG qqnkM3cXBzd2JtesOHC+5f38VhyJIX0E+XXO/TZJ+Y019OxsWqkvmMq1sTaT+J+emzLMSu lXyTfsY2TjF8eVgy9PTZjs1z/FVVLvPTwNZve1qcbXRjwIhL7QuK85235FlipsXxtccsCT 0UahOuRi7w9ZhLffoDRzXhra4do0Uac7YnvaUZnecJLnUSplJHaJ7KH8hv2DMQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1757605777; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UuMEMPuykm7rNGqGRgSYCtjd+uJaJUQH41mpXqr8O2w=; b=8EyvGHyLQfWvch9vyXZ0F+oYN8ZCmX7LrZq8smIyrF3OFyBr/PeUHLTanMneSn8D2Sylym y8TAWPkIKCXiKnDQ== To: Marc Zyngier Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Mark Rutland , Will Deacon , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Rob Herring , Saravana Kannan , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Sven Peter , Janne Grunau , Suzuki K Poulose , James Clark Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/25] irqdomain: Add firmware info reporting interface In-Reply-To: <86a531cc1q.wl-maz@kernel.org> References: <20250908163127.2462948-1-maz@kernel.org> <20250908163127.2462948-2-maz@kernel.org> <87ikhsvvau.ffs@tglx> <86a531cc1q.wl-maz@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 17:49:36 +0200 Message-ID: <877by5rnu7.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250911_084942_149308_6CD512BD X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.56 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Sep 11 2025 at 15:13, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Tue, 09 Sep 2025 10:18:01 +0100, > Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >> On Mon, Sep 08 2025 at 17:31, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > [...] > >> > @@ -69,6 +90,8 @@ void of_phandle_args_to_fwspec(struct device_node *np, const u32 *args, >> > * @translate: Given @fwspec, decode the hardware irq number (@out_hwirq) and >> > * linux irq type value (@out_type). This is a generalised @xlate >> > * (over struct irq_fwspec) and is preferred if provided. >> > + * @get_info: Given @info, report additional firmware-provided information. >> > + * Optional. >> >> get_info() is pretty generic. Can we have some more descriptive name for >> that? Also please keep the tabular formatting of the doc intact. > > Would get_fwspec_info() be descriptive enough? I think so