linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: richard clark <richard.xnu.clark@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irq: fix the interrupt trigger type override issue
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2024 11:51:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877cbu7596.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJNi4rPm2N=_H7LjT3X3_b2-UVZP+EEOw-ztwBwWBs=vMtfYQQ@mail.gmail.com>

Richard!

On Mon, Sep 02 2024 at 16:42, richard clark wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 3:34 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>> 1) insmod()
>>      irq_create_fwspec_mapping(fwspec)
>>        irq_domain_translate(fwspec, ... &type); <- Sets type to the FW value
>>
>>        virq = irq_find_mapping(domain, hwirq);
>>        if (virq) {
>>          // Path not taken
>>        }
>>
>>        // Map interrupt
>>        ...
>>
>>        irqd_set_trigger_type(..., type);
>>
>> 2) rmmod()
>>      tears down mapping
>>
> This just tears down the action allocated and installed by
> request_irq(...), but does not teardown the irq's node inserted in the
> revmap_tree.

So what creates the mapping? If the driver creates it then why doesn't
it unmap it when it exits?

>> 3) insmod()
>>
>>       Should be exactly the same as #1 because the previous mapping was
>>       torn down by rmmod()
>>
> Not the same exactly, the {irq, irq_data} will still be in the
> revmap_tree, so it will enter another path in this case:

That's exactly the question. Why does the mapping persist?

>> So how exactly does that happen what you describe?
>>
> The logic is if the trigger type specified by request_irq(...) is not
> consistent with the firmware one, the request_irq will override the
> FW. We need to keep this logic the same as when we insmod the same
> kmod next time -- override the FW's too instead of returning a
> mismatch type error.

I can see how that can happen, but what's missing is the information why
this mapping persists and why it's tried to be set up again.

Thanks,

        tglx


  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-02  9:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-02  3:17 [PATCH] irq: fix the interrupt trigger type override issue Richard Clark
2024-09-02  7:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-02  8:42   ` richard clark
2024-09-02  9:51     ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-09-02 12:50       ` richard clark
2024-09-02 14:39         ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-03  7:55           ` Richard Clark
2024-09-03 10:18             ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877cbu7596.ffs@tglx \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richard.xnu.clark@gmail.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).