Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable zram, xfs and loading compressed FW support

From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@redhat.com>,
	Erico Nunes <nunes.erico@gmail.com>,
	Enric Balletbo i Serra <eballetbo@redhat.com>,
	Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>,
	Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@quicinc.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable zram, xfs and loading compressed FW support
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 20:06:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877cixiqn3.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <205248ce-caeb-4090-998e-379f79639bec@linaro.org>

Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> writes:

> On 21/02/2024 16:31, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024, at 13:59, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>> These options are needed by some Linux distributions (e.g: Fedora), so
>>> let's enable them to make it easier for developers using such distros.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>> 
>> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>> 
>>> @@ -1595,6 +1599,7 @@ CONFIG_HTE_TEGRA194_TEST=m
>>>  CONFIG_EXT2_FS=y
>>>  CONFIG_EXT3_FS=y
>>>  CONFIG_EXT4_FS_POSIX_ACL=y
>>> +CONFIG_XFS_FS=m
>>>  CONFIG_BTRFS_FS=m
>>>  CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_POSIX_ACL=y
>> 
>> Unfortunately this will increase build time noticeably, but
>> I agree it is the right thing to do.
>> 
>> Can you send it (with any other acks) to soc@kernel.org so
>> I can merge it from there?
>
> Due to XFS, please include:
>
> Nacked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>

Don't worry, I won't to re-send anything if you disagree with the change.

> so this will not be precedence used for further patches like this
> (Maxime already used such argument, so I want to be sure it will not be
> used against me in the future)
>

I used the same argument and is a fair one in my opinion. Removing other
filesystems should send the correct message, if that is the agreegment.

-- 
Best regards,

Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel