Re: [PATCH v5 05/19] arm64: Add support for trace synchronization barrier

From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, coresight@lists.linaro.org,
	mike.leach@linaro.org, leo.yan@linaro.org,
	anshuman.khandual@arm.com, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/19] arm64: Add support for trace synchronization barrier
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 17:40:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877dlwsb54.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210324171934.GB3709@arm.com>

On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 17:19:36 +0000,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 05:06:58PM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> > On 24/03/2021 16:30, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > >
> > > OK, so we definitely do need these patches, don't we? Both? Just one?
> > > Please have a look at kvmarm/fixes and tell me what I must keep.
> > 
> > Both of them are fixes.
> > 
> > commit "KVM: arm64: Disable guest access to trace filter controls"
> >  - This fixes guest fiddling with the trace filter control as described
> > above.
> > 
> > commit "KVM: arm64: Hide system instruction access to Trace registers"
> >  - Fixes the Hypervisor to advertise what it doesn't support. i.e
> >    stop advertising trace system instruction access to a guest.
> >    Otherwise a guest which trusts the ID registers
> >    (ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.TRACEVER == 1) can crash while trying to access the
> >    trace register as we trap the accesses (CPTR_EL2.TTA == 1). On Linux,
> >    the ETM drivers need a DT explicitly advertising the support. So,
> >    this is not immediately impacted. And this fix goes a long way back
> >    in the history, when the CPTR_EL2.TTA was added.
> > 
> > Now, the reason for asking you to hold on is the way this could create
> > conflicts in merging the rest of the series.
> 
> The way we normally work around this is to either rebase your series on
> top of -rc5 when the fixes go in or, if you want an earlier -rc base,
> Marc can put them on a stable branch somewhere that you can use.

Here's what I've done:

- the two patches are now on a branch[1] based off -rc3 which I
  officially declare stable. Feel free to rebase your series on top.

- the KVM fixes branch now embeds this branch (yes, I've rebased it --
  we'll hopefully survive the outrage).

Thanks,

	M.

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm.git/log/?h=trace-fixes-5.12

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel