From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: robert.jarzmik@free.fr (Robert Jarzmik) Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 11:08:02 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 0/9] ARM: pxa/mmp cleanups and warning fixes In-Reply-To: <24241162.8H4bJ4YIKl@wuerfel> (Arnd Bergmann's message of "Fri, 29 Jan 2016 16:48:33 +0100") References: <1454076396-3563101-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <87io2c76hh.fsf@belgarion.home> <24241162.8H4bJ4YIKl@wuerfel> Message-ID: <877fir7531.fsf@belgarion.home> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Arnd Bergmann writes: > On Friday 29 January 2016 16:25:30 Robert Jarzmik wrote: >> Arnd Bergmann writes: >> >> > These are all fixes for harmless warnings, aside from the first >> > patch, which is a cleanup. Please pick them up into the PXA >> > tree (my preference), or provide an Ack so I can put them >> > into arm-soc. >> Hi Arnd, >> >> I'll pick them up, provided the acks (for clock tree for example). The >> pxa-for-4.6 will happen. >> >> I'll just have a check on 1/9 to verify nobody hides in a corner a direct CKEN >> access, and try to understand more thoroughly 7/9, all the others look good to >> me. > > Ok, sounds good. If you are unsure about it, you can also drop that > one or do a broader version of it that does the other registers as well. > I don't think it caused any compiler warnings, which is what I'm trying > to handle right now. You're right, I checked and it's good. tc-arm.c in gcc is a good lecture. I'll queue 1/9 up to 8/9 in pxa/for-next, thanks. Cheers. -- Robert