From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: kvalo@codeaurora.org (Kalle Valo)
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 15:03:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH, RESEND^2] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused
In-Reply-To: <6063400.39vor3soEb@wuerfel> (Arnd Bergmann's message of "Mon, 18
 Jan 2016 20:39:56 +0100")
References: <8128014.DbbgBtKY3z@wuerfel>
 <8760ywd5fe.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <6063400.39vor3soEb@wuerfel>
Message-ID: <877fj567ri.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes:

> The SoC variant of the ssb code is now optional like the other
> ones, which means we can build the framwork without any
> front-end, but that results in a warning:
>
> drivers/ssb/main.c:616:12: warning: 'ssb_bus_register' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>
> This annotates the ssb_bus_register function as __maybe_unused to
> shut up the warning. A configuration like this will not work on
> any hardware of course, but we still want this to silently build
> without warnings if the configuration is allowed in the first
> place.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Fixes: 845da6e58e19 ("ssb: add Kconfig entry for compiling SoC related code")
> Acked-by: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch>
> ---
> Resent to linux-wireless as requested

Thanks, and sorry for the hassle. I'm planning to push this to 4.5.

-- 
Kalle Valo