[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2 11/27] drm/sun4i: tcon: Add support for tcon-top gate

Chen-Yu Tsai
2018-06-25T08:14:52Z

On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 3:58 PM, Jernej ?krabec
<jernej.skrabec@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dne ponedeljek, 25. junij 2018 ob 05:51:41 CEST je Chen-Yu Tsai napisal(a):
>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 3:52 AM, Jernej ?krabec
>>
>> <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Dne ?etrtek, 21. junij 2018 ob 17:35:45 CEST je Jernej ?krabec napisal(a):
>> >> Dne ?etrtek, 21. junij 2018 ob 03:23:27 CEST je Chen-Yu Tsai napisal(a):
>> >> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 3:37 AM, Jernej ?krabec
>> >> > <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>
>> >>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > > Dne sobota, 16. junij 2018 ob 07:48:38 CEST je Chen-Yu Tsai
> napisal(a):
>> >> > >> On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 1:33 AM, Jernej ?krabec
>> >> > >> <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>
>> >> > >
>> >> > > wrote:
>> >> > >> > Dne petek, 15. junij 2018 ob 19:13:17 CEST je Chen-Yu Tsai
>> >
>> > napisal(a):
>> >> > >> >> On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 12:41 AM, Jernej ?krabec
>> >> > >> >>
>> >> > >> >> <jernej.skrabec@siol.net> wrote:
>> >> > >> >> > Hi,
>> >> > >> >> >
>> >> > >> >> > Dne petek, 15. junij 2018 ob 10:31:10 CEST je Maxime Ripard
>> >>
>> >> napisal(a):
>> >> > >> >> >> Hi,
>> >> > >> >> >>
>> >> > >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 10:00:20PM +0200, Jernej Skrabec
> wrote:
>> >> > >> >> >> > TV TCONs connected to TCON TOP have to enable additional
>> >> > >> >> >> > gate
>> >> > >> >> >> > in
>> >> > >> >> >> > order
>> >> > >> >> >> > to work.
>> >> > >> >> >> >
>> >> > >> >> >> > Add support for such TCONs.
>> >> > >> >> >> >
>> >> > >> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>
>> >> > >> >> >> > ---
>> >> > >> >> >> >
>> >> > >> >> >> > drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c | 11 +++++++++++
>> >> > >> >> >> > drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.h | 4 ++++
>> >> > >> >> >> > 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>> >> > >> >> >> >
>> >> > >> >> >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
>> >> > >> >> >> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c index
>> >> > >> >> >> > 08747fc3ee71..0afb5a94a414
>> >> > >> >> >> > 100644
>> >> > >> >> >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
>> >> > >> >> >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
>> >> > >> >> >> > @@ -688,6 +688,16 @@ static int
>> >> > >> >> >> > sun4i_tcon_init_clocks(struct
>> >> > >> >> >> > device
>> >> > >> >> >> > *dev,
>> >> > >> >> >> >
>> >> > >> >> >> > dev_err(dev, "Couldn't get the TCON bus
>> >> > >> >> >> > clock\n");
>> >> > >> >> >> > return PTR_ERR(tcon->clk);
>> >> > >> >> >> >
>> >> > >> >> >> > }
>> >> > >> >> >> >
>> >> > >> >> >> > +
>> >> > >> >> >> > + if (tcon->quirks->has_tcon_top_gate) {
>> >> > >> >> >> > + tcon->top_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "tcon-top");
>> >> > >> >> >> > + if (IS_ERR(tcon->top_clk)) {
>> >> > >> >> >> > + dev_err(dev, "Couldn't get the TCON TOP
>> >> > >> >> >> > bus
>> >> > >> >> >> > clock\n");
>> >> > >> >> >> > + return PTR_ERR(tcon->top_clk);
>> >> > >> >> >> > + }
>> >> > >> >> >> > + clk_prepare_enable(tcon->top_clk);
>> >> > >> >> >> > + }
>> >> > >> >> >> > +
>> >> > >> >> >>
>> >> > >> >> >> Is it required for the TCON itself to operate, or does the
>> >> > >> >> >> TCON
>> >> > >> >> >> requires the TCON TOP, which in turn requires that clock to be
>> >> > >> >> >> functional?
>> >> > >> >> >>
>> >> > >> >> >> I find it quite odd to have a clock that isn't meant for a
>> >> > >> >> >> particular
>> >> > >> >> >> device to actually be wired to another device. I'm not saying
>> >> > >> >> >> this
>> >> > >> >> >> isn't the case, but it would be a first.
>> >> > >> >> >
>> >> > >> >> > Documentation doesn't say much about that gate. I did few tests
>> >> > >> >> > and
>> >> > >> >> > TCON
>> >> > >> >> > registers can be read and written even if TCON TOP TV TCON gate
>> >> > >> >> > is
>> >> > >> >> > disabled. However, there is no image, as expected.
>> >> > >> >>
>> >> > >> >> The R40 manual does include it in the diagram, on page 504.
>> >> > >> >> There's
>> >> > >> >> also
>> >> > >> >> a
>> >> > >> >> mux to select whether the clock comes directly from the CCU or
>> >> > >> >> the
>> >> > >> >> TV
>> >> > >> >> encoder (a feedback mode?). I assume this is the gate you are
>> >> > >> >> referring
>> >> > >> >> to
>> >> > >> >> here, in which case it is not a bus clock, but rather the TCON
>> >> > >> >> module
>> >> > >> >> or
>> >> > >> >> channel clock, strangely routed.
>> >> > >> >>
>> >> > >> >> > More interestingly, I enabled test pattern directly in TCON to
>> >> > >> >> > eliminate
>> >> > >> >> > influence of the mixer. As soon as I disabled that gate, test
>> >> > >> >> > pattern
>> >> > >> >> > on
>> >> > >> >> > HDMI screen was gone, which suggest that this gate influences
>> >> > >> >> > something
>> >> > >> >> > inside TCON.
>> >> > >> >> >
>> >> > >> >> > Another test I did was that I moved enable/disable gate code to
>> >> > >> >> > sun4i_tcon_channel_set_status() and it worked just as well.
>> >> > >> >> >
>> >> > >> >> > I'll ask AW engineer what that gate actually does, but from
>> >> > >> >> > what I
>> >> > >> >> > saw,
>> >> > >> >> > I
>> >> > >> >> > would say that most appropriate location to enable/disable TCON
>> >> > >> >> > TOP
>> >> > >> >> > TV
>> >> > >> >> > TCON
>> >> > >> >> > gate is TCON driver. Alternatively, TCON TOP driver could check
>> >> > >> >> > if
>> >> > >> >> > any
>> >> > >> >> > TV
>> >> > >> >> > TCON is in use and enable appropriate gate. However, that
>> >> > >> >> > doesn't
>> >> > >> >> > sound
>> >> > >> >> > right to me for some reason.
>> >> > >> >>
>> >> > >> >> If what I said above it true, then yes, the appropriate location
>> >> > >> >> to
>> >> > >> >> enable
>> >> > >> >> it is the TCON driver, but moreover, the representation of the
>> >> > >> >> clock
>> >> > >> >> tree
>> >> > >> >> should be fixed such that the TCON takes the clock from the TCON
>> >> > >> >> TOP
>> >> > >> >> as
>> >> > >> >> its
>> >> > >> >> channel/ module clock instead. That way you don't need this
>> >> > >> >> patch,
>> >> > >> >> but
>> >> > >> >> you'd add another for all the clock routing.
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > Can you be more specific? I not sure what you mean here.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> For clock related properties in the device tree:
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> &tcon_top {
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_TCON_TOP>,
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> <&ccu CLK_TCON_TV0>,
>> >> > >> <&tve0>,
>> >> > >> <&ccu CLK_TCON_TV1>,
>> >> > >> <&tve1>;
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> clock-names = "bus", "tcon-tv0", "tve0", "tcon-tv1", "tve1";
>> >> > >> clock-output-names = "tcon-top-tv0", "tcon-top-tv1";
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> };
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> &tcon_tv0 {
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_TCON_TV0>, <&tcon_top 0>'
>> >> > >> clock-names = "ahb", "tcon-ch1";
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> };
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> A diagram would look like:
>> >> > >> | This part is TCON TOP |
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> v v
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> CCU CLK_TCON_TV0 --|----\ |
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> | mux ---- gate ----|-- TCON_TV0
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> TVE0 --------------|----/ |
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> And the same goes for TCON_TV1 and TVE1.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> The user manual is a bit lacking on how TVE outputs a clock though.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I didn't yet received any response on HW details from AW till now,
>> >> > > but I
>> >> > > would like to post new version of patches soon.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > While chaining like you described could be implemented easily, I
>> >> > > don't
>> >> > > think it really represents HW as it is. Tests showed that these two
>> >> > > clocks are independent, otherwise register writes/reads wouldn't be
>> >> > > possible with tcon- top gate disabled. I chose tcon-top bus clock as
>> >> > > a
>> >> > > parent becase if it is not enabled, it simply won't work.
>> >> >
>> >> > AFAIK with the TCONs, even when the TCON channel clock (not the bus
>> >> > clock)
>> >> > is disabled, register accesses still work.
>> >>
>> >> You're right, I just tested that.
>> >>
>> >> > I'm saying that the TCON TOP
>> >> > gate is downstream from the TCON channel clock in the CCU. These are
>> >> > not
>> >> > related to the TCON bus clock in the CCU, which affects register
>> >> > access.
>> >> >
>> >> > Did Allwinner provide any information regarding the hierarchy of the
>> >> > clocks?
>> >>
>> >> No reponse for now.
>> >>
>> >> > > However, if everyone feels chaining is the best way to implement it,
>> >> > > I'll
>> >> > > do it.
>> >> >
>> >> > I would like to get it right and match actual hardware. My proposal is
>> >> > based on my understanding from the diagrams in the user manual.
>> >>
>> >> So for now, your explanation is the most reasonable. Should we go ahead
>> >> and
>> >> implement your idea?
>> >>
>> >> Please note that H6 has TCON-TOP too, but it has only one LCD TCON and
>> >> one
>> >> TV TCON instead of two of each kind. That means we will have hole in
>> >> indices (tcon_lcd0 is 1, tcon_tv0 is 3, which is aligned with R40) and
>> >> different TCON- TOP binding (no tcon_tv1 channel clock), but setup is
>> >> exactly the same.
>> >
>> > I just noticed issue with this proposal. If we have following clock chain
>> > for HDMI, everythings is ok:
>> >
>> > TCON-TV0 -> TCON-TOP-TV0
>> >
>> > TCON TV sets TCON-TOP-TV0 clock rate, which in turn sets TCON-TV0 clock
>> > and
>> > everything works.
>> >
>> > However, when TVE will be configured, it would look like this:
>> >
>> > TVE0 -> TCON-TOP-TV0
>> >
>> > TVE driver will set TVE0 clock to 216 MHz and TCON TV would set
>> > TCON-TOP-TV0 rate which in turn sets TVE0 clock to something like 13.5
>> > MHz (or whatever is the right clock rate for PAL and NTSC). As you can
>> > see, same clock is set to two different rates by two different drivers.
>> >
>> > It *might* still work, since encoders set clock rate after TCON (at least
>> > that is my experience for HDMI pipeline), but that is still wrong.
>> >
>> > To overcome above issue, I would stick to original proposal with
>> > additional
>> > clock specified in TCON TV DT node. That way TCON driver would always set
>> > clock rate to TCON-TV0 clock. If TVE0 is enabled, TCON wouldn't interfere
>> > with setting clock rate, because TCON-TV0 clock would be decoupled in
>> > TCON-TOP mux.
>> >
>> > What do you think?
>>
>> I think this is the wrong representation, and worse, you are trying to work
>> around software issues with it.
>>
>> So to confirm some details, the TVE expects 216 MHz clock, and it expects
>> the TCON to run and output data at 216 MHz as well. Is that correct?
>
> Yes, from my understanding. 216 MHz is correct at least for PAL and NTSC, e.g.
> TV mode. TVE on R40 is also capable of RGB mode (VGA connector).
>
>>
>> Would any settings for the TCON differ between when HDMI or TVE is used?
>>
>
> Apart of clock, no, other settings would be the same.
>
>> Does TVE and TCON run at 216 MHz regardless of resolution? I kind of doubt
>> it. It might be expecting 297 MHz for PC resolutions.
>
> Please check this table in BSP:
> https://github.com/BPI-SINOVOIP/BPI-M2U-bsp/blob/master/linux-sunxi/drivers/
> video/sunxi/disp2/tv/drv_tv.c#L24
>
> 216 MHz is applicable for low resolution, interlaced modes. Modes like 1080P,
> 1080I have expected standard timing.

That's weird. So it only applies to SDTV video resolutions. I remember
seeing an "up sampling" setting for composite in the TVE, which goes all
the way up to 216 MHz. Maybe that's the reason?

I wonder how the TCON manages this though. I mean with the dot clock this
high, doesn't that mean the frame rate is much higher?

>>
>> I think these kinds of quirks should be handled in the software, instead of
>> being papered over.
>
> Ok, that works for me too. I would just like to have such design that would
> later allow implementing TVE driver without much issues.
>
> BTW, H3 TV TCON which is connected to TVE doesn't have TCON-TV channel clock
> at all, since it is controlled with TVE clock (same case as it would be here,
> if TCON TOP mux is switched to TVE clock source).

Does it require 216 MHz as well?

> Maybe quirk can be added that it doesn't set clock rate at all if it is
> connected to TVE?

A quirk yes. But the dot clock would be 216 MHz instead of not setting it,
and only for certain display modes. To be honest I think we can get by with
just a TODO note for now.

ChenYu