From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AF49C0219B for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 02:17:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:CC:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=30Rn7QhM1tQPQQ9WH4FbwPWMKd3IRZbkkYDlreV1How=; b=Ns18u1tdJvl6gl71oKs/KskhgK 7oHvjbmjj8tJt3xd8CtZDTMeT22lkYII5fV7V6vaaOMtDbNHUOWuquGiZR4mE20LggvHyqZ8iNFgO AhuGzWbV27y799L4P1I2HfWhgDoDEz+Fe5Wq4f350b0219SD5lw7A1j1QtyKvy0NlEbyejO3Q87Eu W9uVLV01T15hpVuOkuWM0cf4cDLgaoIhncOEgd9paFpUa3sChBDLV4KkLT4zP9oCFGlPGxpMipNuX jCqs7t5iABM12il+444+CC15ItdJBb/aPiEvnDsaGgJwtW0WwuFODi/GYKNtGsYlhMQlg0ZrKhCFs oLMVy7sg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1thfpe-00000002FZN-4ByC; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 02:17:03 +0000 Received: from mx0b-0031df01.pphosted.com ([205.220.180.131]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1thfnc-00000002FEP-3BxR for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 02:14:57 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (m0279873.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 51AK39Sp018199; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 02:14:41 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=quicinc.com; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to; s=qcppdkim1; bh= 30Rn7QhM1tQPQQ9WH4FbwPWMKd3IRZbkkYDlreV1How=; b=koieKIXH8FSo2+SK NApGXij7v7cQcPIEKzXVOaJeLodaqU78xWk6sdolNJG0dsFNKYOxQ5aJrlGaGAaZ 4Vo2UFKFoe7Y/3Ohn4w0LMRhru9n2xBvtSbCcjZv0plZJ6A7odmInKLeJVtR6m0Z De8UOPtWTHIBkK7GwfxYVr6ZnfarIvYAt/wN4xIjFOAdEcv3OaRjt96ZDVJcVkOy exH3bRhDGRDF36S3ge5dRgFpFgNU+0o2HoXyoPEcteQmlivIQiLU5GsxXJPInc44 XnJ3+tm7r/1+jSb+VmzCc6qzj3EqE5hW4NmVUdG7hzxDwwQHgbfvynarrKL15zv1 123ssg== Received: from nalasppmta03.qualcomm.com (Global_NAT1.qualcomm.com [129.46.96.20]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 44p0dxp8re-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 11 Feb 2025 02:14:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nalasex01c.na.qualcomm.com (nalasex01c.na.qualcomm.com [10.47.97.35]) by NALASPPMTA03.qualcomm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTPS id 51B2EeIS013108 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 11 Feb 2025 02:14:40 GMT Received: from [10.253.11.86] (10.80.80.8) by nalasex01c.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.97.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.9; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 18:14:33 -0800 Message-ID: <878b8237-7f37-4f98-8e3b-451eb5ab3283@quicinc.com> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 10:14:30 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] net: stmmac: dwmac-qcom-ethqos: Mask PHY mode if configured with rgmii-id To: Andrew Lunn , Konrad Dybcio CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , "Eric Dumazet" , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Vinod Koul , Maxime Coquelin , "Alexandre Torgue" , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , "Richard Cochran" , , , , , , References: <20250121-dts_qcs615-v3-0-fa4496950d8a@quicinc.com> <20250121-dts_qcs615-v3-2-fa4496950d8a@quicinc.com> <30450f09-83d4-4ff0-96b2-9f251f0c0896@kernel.org> <48ce7924-bbb7-4a0f-9f56-681c8b2a21bd@quicinc.com> <2bd19e9e-775d-41b0-99d4-accb9ae8262d@kernel.org> <71da0edf-9b2a-464e-8979-8e09f7828120@oss.qualcomm.com> <46423f11-9642-4239-af5d-3eb3b548b98c@quicinc.com> <60fecdb9-d039-4f76-a368-084664477160@oss.qualcomm.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Yijie Yang In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.80.80.8] X-ClientProxiedBy: nasanex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.52.223.231) To nalasex01c.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.97.35) X-QCInternal: smtphost X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=5800 signatures=585085 X-Proofpoint-GUID: UjCwjgVR3lbjOfI-GM1hxBDzilseh77R X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: UjCwjgVR3lbjOfI-GM1hxBDzilseh77R X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1057,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.68.34 definitions=2025-02-11_01,2025-02-10_01,2024-11-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=723 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2501170000 definitions=main-2502110011 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250210_181456_925898_0990A28B X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.65 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 2025-02-11 05:28, Andrew Lunn wrote: >>> But what about the out-of-tree boards that Andrew mentioned? We need to ensure we don't break them, right? >> >> No. What's not on the list, doesn't exist > > How i worded it was: > >> We care less about out of tree boards, but we also don't needlessly >> break them. > > I guess if Qualcomm wants to break all its customers boards, that is > up to Qualcomm. But we can also make it easier for Qualcomm customers > to get off the vendor crap kernel and to mainline if we at least give > them an easier migration path. I understand the importance of not breaking customers' boards and will work on finding a better solution than the current one. However, if no better solutions are found, we will consider dropping the compatibility. > > Andrew -- Best Regards, Yijie