From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88D65CA5FA5 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 09:53:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Message-ID:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=5QndERAeyHrOlKw2dyPW8c3xDWXtZf30X6T2Mz/d8oU=; b=oT5YM5ypuO4mOIqVOS0ko+26yx ChMdwUONkkPtAa/uQIpgJGk+UZMfhJfe6vhelV1b962OjXutUzTkH8+mZKkMYx0S82HPLCGVqJk+W dmiiBScPt3eipVGRUMG1EsLzMHNBz47jqJjAPxUbMd+MWUehLEv+sRt+YZoM5Wrt8ZP9VsCRrYjoa /XRb9eYTl7XDl6DMwHXtR2U9pgyrsHTzakmcW2paYfeYh1Mr8GQsUD6kYFUzhFKWCp+re57MTBP6Z 3425QFH2UyoDSqJLf9giNCyaMpgai/rrHCg6NqRgIbOaq7kPXWsP9XQSyivovWQ9l1EEQv4ppoH/u vTSOI9Fg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xBUWV-000000031vT-0ZlP; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 09:53:19 +0000 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de ([195.135.223.131]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xBUWS-000000031um-1AgL; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 09:53:17 +0000 Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 820551F444; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 09:53:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1790675588; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5QndERAeyHrOlKw2dyPW8c3xDWXtZf30X6T2Mz/d8oU=; b=IR6OyRhy9njtgSWGu5dmBV5fq2a2iSY7zSpuCnAC4r1LDvrMzaF7HrsGWBC9yc7030Cmey YXmlWgv3VqyPwuNf6kxvymlGhY+o3GG7NYNBT62HDXFxRifA5OUEMpQOyaq/Fld9DIfyDk mCEsKPFAsFoM4TFKDJjgzKC0O/tdx+c= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1790675588; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5QndERAeyHrOlKw2dyPW8c3xDWXtZf30X6T2Mz/d8oU=; b=RI2iC9Uyd+Kid4F1uCZuCevrwCYLsVo5HsM3K2NX+dg/JmeWGYDnMpfctjG7FyGif9graT +6ofcNl6xgt105CA== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=ef8ORTcE; dkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=Jy6iYy8+ DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1790675584; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5QndERAeyHrOlKw2dyPW8c3xDWXtZf30X6T2Mz/d8oU=; b=ef8ORTcEBdUmzDfukXYj0Ra0pCYyGNwZY3AeOcAIG9jdfWU/pD8IBdQxlADdWGHW2yjS6A USif8lF+XS4DV8rGdUqE4YbVrGT9WjOalCZ06HO8AR4WHsw6bsgl4+Gl/jJMvmgwsZ/1Tx MYw0bRj5uKlZTEEFtZz8mpZtlsATiUg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1790675584; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5QndERAeyHrOlKw2dyPW8c3xDWXtZf30X6T2Mz/d8oU=; b=Jy6iYy8+AVNnk0GnA+0G2zcraJ5WdNWWhd1npGOvbUlB+jAegV9NL2JeFC1K2wDFiPXusW ht7mubNR55etGoCA== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03EE2136E4; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 09:53:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id P+SYMn+Ku2pSLQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Tue, 29 Sep 2026 09:53:04 +0000 Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 11:52:59 +0200 Message-ID: <878q4k2xl0.wl-tiwai@suse.de> From: Takashi Iwai To: James Calligeros Cc: Martin =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Povi=B9er?= , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Sven Peter , Janne Grunau , Neal Gompa , David Rhodes , Richard Fitzgerald , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , Ulf Hansson , Amit Kucheria , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Lars-Peter Clausen , Vinod Koul , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Shenghao Ding , Kevin Lu , Baojun Xu , Sen Wang , James Schulman , asahi@lists.linux.dev, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, patches@opensource.cirrus.com, Takashi Iwai , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Hector Martin Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/28] ALSA: control: Add kcontrol callbacks for lock/unlock In-Reply-To: <20260920-macaudio-v1-8-741cc20a74e5@gmail.com> References: <20260920-macaudio-v1-0-741cc20a74e5@gmail.com> <20260920-macaudio-v1-8-741cc20a74e5@gmail.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/30.2 Mule/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 820551F444 X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.01 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.de:s=susede2_rsa,suse.de:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWELVE(0.00)[35]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[suse.de:mid,suse.de:dkim,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:rdns,marcan.st:email]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.de:s=susede2_rsa,suse.de:s=susede2_ed25519]; FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[gmail.com]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[cutebit.org,gmail.com,kernel.org,jannau.net,gompa.dev,cirrus.com,opensource.cirrus.com,perex.cz,suse.com,linaro.org,intel.com,metafoo.de,collabora.com,ti.com,lists.linux.dev,vger.kernel.org,lists.infradead.org,suse.de,marcan.st]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.de:mid,suse.de:dkim,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:rdns]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167:received,2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[lin,dt]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.de:+]; R_RATELIMIT(0.00)[to_ip_from(RLs9qncch5cpanyka9neihc978)]; SPAMHAUS_XBL(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from] X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260929_025316_678232_F630A089 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.63 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sun, 20 Sep 2026 06:53:47 +0200, James Calligeros wrote: > > From: Hector Martin > > This allows drivers to implement policy around locking/unlocking > controls, such as enforcing that a group of controls may only be locked > by the same process/file, and taking actions when the controls > lock/unlock (such as granting special access on lock and resetting > values on unlock). > > This is, in particular, useful to implement volume safety controls, such > that only a particular process (that locks controls and completes a > handshake) may increase volumes above a given safe limit. It also allows > the volume to be automatically lowered if that process dies (which will > trigger an implicit unlock). > > Signed-off-by: Hector Martin > Signed-off-by: James Calligeros This doesn't sound like a good approach to me, and this looks rather irrelevant with the purpose of the series. thanks, Takashi