From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9998C3ABCB for ; Mon, 12 May 2025 18:58:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type:MIME-Version: Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=QgkKtt2m6ip+njKFIPiUxvZoJwWMNpWdYXXziFn05AI=; b=SzHLeX1Uo/48g8xZx+Ixb6P9Ps r9Z7oiIO0RdCVvUV9/k4TTInQLqwRG2tPnnr/GdpSQJzrw/sbMBhgHYvqtVIBIArm8jMrGxSBnOo3 myo5SFcJwS1BQX7FJnltsNmMox7QRSodiv5755eURmrBjUfb74ZGJ+6eNsXfy/XezadHzro4yveJd jud22Mn4LP9eljc9i5KAQPl5bs/kK/1CyeuwPwTn1fe8Cdl+dIcc8YcVQNJiitcEaCGt4DcwfsRgK 3m6YaaI1uSttaOO5U2A7ZsydYfaoRUmsTYee7qVnTXnJC70H9Tha/J0Hx1zaGE57fraBqYJNlgfNH CLrWuyZQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uEYM3-0000000ATCI-33FM; Mon, 12 May 2025 18:58:23 +0000 Received: from galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uEYAJ-0000000ARwQ-0dQO for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 12 May 2025 18:46:16 +0000 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1747075573; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=QgkKtt2m6ip+njKFIPiUxvZoJwWMNpWdYXXziFn05AI=; b=QUDY2qiwkUtrnJxlrwX4pVuiinaAK+xnqMbHi6lmpC+oONYxc1MD0HbYqP1Fjc7X98claX GuYZ13eZOfbVwj1xKdj6TE65CJbXHDvxkkIJBUUO2jS1LhBRPjNhBlZDSMH0wdc0HY4nXA OZU8OXY1xq8GMrJ5Q51dPqT2aJ3h0ohpViTUFN2KJLnFEOX/6bpcUK8ZSd7/C4to2o5+dS WvTHNFZo+dJn1kehrulmR//ZFSVgetiHRjI5kdUGhRtlJoG4wGOX9NTU5KiQ0RiSjAqi+d vntc6qBIRx3DKXMq51TqTLBTxqeqZi0/s1lGRrHJOvQMDfBAgKyUDj54MuLB+A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1747075573; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=QgkKtt2m6ip+njKFIPiUxvZoJwWMNpWdYXXziFn05AI=; b=RjAUd/0kxFpNMmmZYd8Bkma4W7377Bwy2qQJoqSPucE0GOyhVdcSSD2RTVIj5Rh984EQCx F2AFyDvEZhJCvkBA== To: Marc Zyngier Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Lorenzo Pieralisi , Sascha Bischoff , Timothy Hayes Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] genirq/msi: Add .msi_teardown() callback as the reverse of .msi_prepare() In-Reply-To: <86tt5pg6ur.wl-maz@kernel.org> References: <20250511163520.1307654-1-maz@kernel.org> <20250511163520.1307654-2-maz@kernel.org> <87h61plx64.ffs@tglx> <86tt5pg6ur.wl-maz@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 20:46:12 +0200 Message-ID: <878qn1llaj.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250512_114615_329156_3B3CEBB7 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.22 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, May 12 2025 at 16:57, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Mon, 12 May 2025 15:29:39 +0100, > Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> > +static void msi_domain_ops_teardown(struct irq_domain *domain, >> > + msi_alloc_info_t *arg) >> >> No line break required. > > You mean... > >> >> > +{ >> > +} >> > + >> > static void msi_domain_ops_set_desc(msi_alloc_info_t *arg, >> > struct msi_desc *desc) > > ... not like this? Right. That was written before we went to 100 characters line length.