From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman) Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:24:15 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v6 02/16] OMAP2+: hwmod: Add API to check IO PAD wakeup status In-Reply-To: (Govindraj's message of "Mon, 3 Oct 2011 11:26:04 +0530") References: <1317380495-584-1-git-send-email-govindraj.raja@ti.com> <1317380495-584-2-git-send-email-govindraj.raja@ti.com> <4E8724D7.6060907@ti.com> <4E8946BD.1010108@ti.com> Message-ID: <878vosh4ds.fsf@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Govindraj writes: > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote: >> On Monday 03 October 2011 10:30 AM, Govindraj wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Rajendra Nayak ?wrote: >>>> >>>> On Friday 30 September 2011 04:31 PM, Govindraj.R wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Add API to determine IO-PAD wakeup event status for a given >>>>> hwmod dynamic_mux pad. >>>>> >>>>> Wake up event set will be cleared on pad mux_read. >>>> >>>> Are these api's even getting used in this series? >>> >>> Used in Tero's irq_chaining patches. >> >> So shouldn't this patch be part of his series instead? > > Yes it is. Part of his v9-series. > Then please drop from this series and state the introductory patch (PATCH 0/n) that this series has a dependency on Tero's series. Kevin